• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    10 天前

    They are disabling it because the license cost went up 4 cents? Just pass that cost onto the customer. Even if they mark that up several times, I would rather pay that than have my battery drained because I have to software decode a video.

    There is still a lot of H.265 content out there. I have many terabytes of it that I don’t want to transcode.

        • Meron35@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 天前

          Minisforum, beelink, aoostar and many others all make much more competitive offerings.

          No in house NAS OS, but tbh I recommend just taking the plunge to learn how to install your own OS, like Linux.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 天前

          I haven’t settled on anything yet. I basically just want something off-the-shelf which I can run containers on and has good version of Synology Drive. But I just migrated from Windows to Linux, and am finding this to be a sticking point. Synology Drive is available on Linux without on-demand sync. QNap supports QSync on Linux but only for Ubuntu, and it seems like manually unpacking the dev file and installing doesn’t work with latest versions. Running NextCloud on QNap might be an option.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 天前

      From the article:

      Last year, NAS company Synology announced that it was ending support for HEVC, as well as H.264/AVC and VCI, transcoding on its DiskStation Manager and BeeStation OS platforms, saying that “support for video codecs is widespread on end devices, such as smartphones, tablets, computers, and smart TVs.”

      Well, not anymore lol.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 天前

      He’s usually right.

      *On software. For the love of god don’t follow his ideas on consent, child sex, or bestiality.

      • syaochan@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 天前

        For the love of god don’t follow his ideas on consent, child sex, or bestiality.

        Or eating habits

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 天前

          Don’t bother. It’s shit taken out of context and overblown. Guy is a massive autist and he made some statements regarding freedom. Since then he corrected most of his statements that caused controversy with more empathy. All this without ever blaming it on his autism.

          • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 天前

            Can you explain how his ideas on consent, child sex, or bestiality are just “some statements regarding freedom.”

            I sense a lot of cult ideology with your take, similar to how how magats defend every horrible thing orange turd says.

            “hE’s jUsT tRoLliNg yOu lIbTaRds”

            Everyone can walk back on statements that causes them bad press, it’s how he thought those things were okay in the first place, the problem.

            • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 天前

              He is autistic, it causes commincation issues.

              Everyone is susceptible this, you for example with how the previous comment said it’s from autistism and you failed to process this.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 天前

        Never meet your heroes. Speaking from very literal experience regarding Stallman.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    9 天前

    Let me get this straight - people buy a product advertised as having a feature, containing a part also advertised as having that feature, and then they disable it after purchase?

    How is that legal?

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 天前

      No, they disable it before purchase, existing laptops still have the feature. Only the newer ones so they won’t have to pay the royalties from next year. But still an anti consumer move as nobody will notice until it’s too late for a refund. Normal people will never understand why their $200 phone can smoothly play h265 videos while their $1500 laptop is struggling with that. Everyone will assume that because hardware support is included in the cheapest processors from even a decade ago, it will still be present in the latest and greatest laptops from hp

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    9 天前

    Yes this is absolutely ridiculous.

    This is also a good reason to avoid proprietary codecs. H.265 may be a great codec, but the licensing fees are basically a tax on the world.

    The best solution would be an overall switch to AV1. But silicon support for that is not nearly as widespread.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 天前

      Yeah that’s going to change fucking fast. My game streaming service I build from older parts to cut costs has 1 shiney modern part because of AV1. Just AV1. Nothing else influenced the purchase of that part.

      And there is no way a big company made that part just for me.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 天前

        Yeah but look at the AV1 hardware support matrix. A lot of current mobile silicon supports decode, not nearly as much supports encode. To have AV1 truly replace MP4/MP5 a hardware encode is necessary so you can do video calls in AV1.

        The one who could really make this happen is Apple. If they decided to move away from MPEG-LA and embraced open codecs (AV1 / VP9 / Opus / FLAC / AVIF / JPEGXL / JPEG2000), supporting them in software, hardware, and their services (imessage/ichat/facetime, music store, video store) that would single handedly push the industry.

        They did that with HEIC- before iPhones switched to HEIC by default nobody bothered with the encumbered format. Now it’s become de facto standard. That SHOULD have been something open like AVIF, JPEG XL, etc.

          • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 天前

            Nobody knows what to do with it because it’s proprietary and requires a license. If it was not encumbered, windows would ship with a decoder built-in for free and nobody would have a problem. If Apple devices didn’t use it by default, no one would have a problem because they just wouldn’t use it for anything ever.

            If Apple got sick of paying the fee, they could switch to AVIF or JPEG XL or anything else. It wouldn’t be hard, just bake native support into the next OS of everything, and have the next iPhone take pictures in that format by default. The rest of the world will catch up right quick.

            Actually come to think of it I’m kind of surprised Google doesn’t do that. Make the native Android camera shoot in AVIF by default…

            • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 天前

              Google does all the same evil shit apple does and nerfs it just enough to spin a good image. They are not your friend.

              • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 天前

                Never said they were my friend. They might have been once, in the ‘Don’t be evil’ era, but that era is long past.

                They are however somewhat more interested in open standards than Apple. Android for example uses OGG a bunch under the hood.

  • dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 天前

    Imagine buying a “Pro” laptop that can’t even play HEVC videos without software transcoding. This is insane penny pinching and infuriating

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 天前

    I don’t for a second believe this is about the rising cost. It raised by $0.04. Someone below said that works out to a savings of $600,000.

    Alright, but for an individual, it’s $0.04.

    Just increase the final price by $0.25. You made back your $600,000. Plus whatever $0.21 would equate to as GAINS.

    Fuck guys. You suck at business. This is what happens when companies replace their CEO with AI.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      9 天前

      The real key is buried in the middle, where they say hardware decode capabilities are going to be restricted to models with discrete GPUs… Meaning they can make a $500 upsell mandatory for the most basic of capabilities.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 天前

        Both HP and Dell are partnered with Microsoft, and have been for decades. Isn’t a discrete GPU one of the things required for Microsoft Recall ready machines?

        There’s NO way they broke HEVC just for 4¢. Something else is paying them a lot more, and Recall would be one of those things.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 天前

      The HP 16" EliteBook 665 G11 Notebook costs $1500. That means this $600k “cost cutting” measure starts to decrease revenue if only 400 people buy a laptop from a different brand.

      Or even a single person. Someone tasked to purchase 400 laptops for a company, reads this news and decides to get ThinkPads instead…

      Sell the CEO private jet if they really need the money

  • hayvan@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    9 天前

    So the hardware is capable, but refuses to work until someone pays for the licensing cost. Yay capitalism bringing innovation!

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 天前

      It’s interesting how the tone of innovation changes. It starts out like “hey, I can do that better than my competitors!” and that’s all fine, doing something better creating market demand and cash influx. But eventually, the innovation looks for shortcuts… enshitification is the word. Cheaper parts, smaller quantities, subscriptions to hardware you buy but never own… There’s a shift from product/service innovation as means to financial growth to purely financially incentivized innovation.

      It reminds me of Marx’s idea that concentration of capital naturally leads to the prominence of financial markets, an indicator of a capitalist economy reaching its “advanced” / crisis-prone phase. The similarity being: there’s an economic shift from industrial investment as means to financial growth to purely financial investment.

  • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    10 天前

    increasing from $0.20 each to $0.24 each in the United States. To put that into perspective, in Q3 2025, HP sold 15,002,000 laptops and desktops

    “This is pretty ridiculous, given these systems are $800+ a machine

    I wonder how long the list of these fees for one machine is

    • FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      10 天前

      Reading through a bit it sounds like it works on Linux, not on Windows. Folks are hypothesizing it’s disabled at the ACPI level because different drivers don’t help.

  • sepi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 天前

    Here’s two brands I’ve not touched in decades. Keeping it that way.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 天前

      What have you touched recently? Asking, because my Lenovo V14 thing is fine inside, but everything mechanical is crumbling in my hands.

      • monis@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 天前

        It might be possible for you to replace the ‘upper case / palmrest’ (top section of your laptop with the keyboard and trackpad.)

        Check the manual to see, buy a generic computer repair kit with basic tools to open a laptop case, buy a set of screws in bulk from aliexpress. The screw sizes may not have to match exactly, but it depends on the screw and location.

        You could try following the manual during the repair, but I found it to be cumbersome and unnecessary. I was able to replace the upper case of my laptop in less than 15 minutes by just looking at it and removing what was in the way.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 天前

          My problem is mostly with the moving parts and places with screws, all the plastic there is cracked and crumbling.

          So it’d be more like replacing the whole “shell”, which would make sense if I knew where one can buy that, LOL.

          • nyan@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 天前

            In the worst case? On ebay, as a “For parts/not working” model with a reasonably intact exterior. Might take a bit of patience.

          • monis@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 天前

            You may be able to find the replacement parts on amazon or the manufacturer’s website.

            Look up replacement parts for your specific model and go from there.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 天前

        Lenovo V series is cheap, prefer Thinkpads, especially T series. Used Thinkpads tend to still last a long time.

        HP Pavilion and Dell Inspiron or whatever are also cheap and worse quality than the cheap Lenovos IMO. HP Elitebooks were fine last I touched them, years aho. Dell Latitude too, though bad models exist

    • Gerowen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 天前

      H.265 (HEVC) is not a free (as in freedom) codec, so yes. You as an individual consumer can use things like Handbrake to encode H.265 video for your personal use, probably using the free x265 software encoder, but in order for a device like your phone, camera, TV, laptop, etc. to have hardware accelerated encoding or decoding, the manufacturer has to pay a licensing fee.

      This is true of lots of proprietary technologies. HDMI is another one. In order for a device to ship with an HDMI port (as opposed to Displayport), the manufacturer has to pay a per-device licensing fee.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 天前

        To be fair, I think it is okay to ask for a one-time fee for something you’ve developed. You want to use this $tech that I made? Sure, pay me 10 ct for every device you put it in.

        • Gerowen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 天前

          That’s reasonable, people deserve to get paid for their labor. In this situation however, the difference between them is that DisplayPort is a royalty free VESA standard. So while manufacturers have to pay for the materials and such to include it in their devices, they don’t have to pay any additional fees to license the standard. HDMI on the other-hand is a “brand” of proprietary connector/interface (kind of like how “Velcro” isn’t the actual name of a product, it’s a “brand” of hook and pile tape), so not only do manufacturers have to pay for the materials and labor related to physically acquiring and installing the connectors, but they have to pay both per-device and annual licensing fees for rights to use the HDMI product.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 天前

        has to pay a per-device licensing fee.

        Where I’m confused, is that it would be a perpertual/long term annual license fee per device. It would make sense to have a one time fee per device shipped. That would not affect older models.

        I guess what is happening is that manufacturers can stop paying for the capabilities by “downgrading” their driver support, and it affects old and new systems the same when users “update”?

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 天前

          The headline is a little misleading.

          As I understand it, they haven’t retroactively removed the HEVC capability from any devices that already shipped with it enabled.

          Rather, they have stopped including it in new ones of the same model or in certain new models, even though those machines still have CPUs which have the capability built in for it.

          This has resulted in e.g. businesses buying a laptop which works fine for conference calls and other stuff, then buying another laptop the “exact same” and suddenly it’s nerfed.

        • Gerowen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 天前

          H.265 is not a royalty free standard like AV1, VP9, Theora, etc. It’s covered by proprietary patents held by groups like MPEG LA so in order for manufacturers to build hardware level support for it into their devices they have to pay whatever the then current royalty fees are to those patent holders.

        • SynAcker@lemmy.dbzer0.comB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 天前

          I’m not sure about those… But I do know what they don’t have to pay extra for is DisplayPort which is far superior to Hdmi.

        • Gerowen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 天前

          VGA was originally a proprietary technology developed by IBM, though it was later built upon by VESA and is now publicly documented, so while it wasn’t developed by VESA as an open standard from the get-go, it is now considered an open standard that doesn’t require any licensing fees to implement. DVI was developed by the “Digital Display Working Group” and also does not require any licensing fees, though there are licensing terms you may have to abide by and there may be some costs associated with testing and validation to ensure you meet those terms and the spec.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 天前

    Dumb of HP and Dell to not eat the cost. Just in the future never support VVC. HEVC is well enough a thing already. Push defaults to be AV1 and then in like 5-7 years, AV2. I use AV1 for everything I can. Computer supports it. My phone does not but edits I do on my PC will be encoded to AV1. Photos, support JPEG-XL but in the interim, AVIF. Screw apple for going with HEIC. I highly doubt that there will be a successor to UHD Blu-Rays to adopt VVC. No big reason to jump to 8k. Only good would be higher bitrates/better compression and audio.

    Films are mostly recorded digitally with 4k-6k cameras or a limited amount of 35mm still going on that scans well to around 4k. 8K digital cinema cameras are becoming more common but the 4k-6k ones are dominant and 70mm is expensive and uncommon. Plus significant digital effects are prevalent on even low action movies, non-sci-fi. Those are still going to have been mostly done and mastered for 4k. Another round of remastering required for 8k content where digital or 70mm film masters exists. Dinosaur broadcasters may choose VVC the shrinking world population watching dinosaur broadcasters. AV1 is increasingly the present and AV2 will be the future. VVC will be end of line because of short sighted greed