John Oliver cited a 5000% rise in search queries related to leaving Meta and deleting accounts. Among the topics mentioned in the analysis, attention was drawn to early Facebook’s naivete with regard to moderation requirements, the constitutional framework, and a history of governmental interference.

Oliver debunks common right-wing “cry censorship” talking points, as well as the objective difficulty of moderation endeavors, and how direct threats by Trump may have influenced Zuckerberg’s turnaround.

Oliver went on to suggest Signal, Mastodon, Bluesky, and Pixelfed as alternatives that “do not seem as desperate to fall in line with Trump”. For those reluctant to completely ditch Meta, Oliver revealed a new site with step-by-step instructions to “make yourself less valuable to them”.

The guide was a collaboration with the EFF, and includes settings’ tweaks for Facebook and Meta, whose 98% of revenue comes from micro-targeting ads, the host previously cited, to increase privacy, and recommends Firefox, Privacy Badger, as “other measures” to take in order “to block advertisers and other third parties from tracking you”.

The segment culminated in a mock advert, in which the new Meta’s approach to moderation is coined as “Fuck it”, and hints to racism, internet scams, and calls to genocide running rampant on Meta’s platforms.

The clip reminds the origins of Facebook as a site to “rank college girls by hotness”, and its implication in genocide in Myanmar, which was more thoroughly discussed in an Oliver’s previous special on Facebook in 2018.

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 hours ago

    John Oliver’s show is doing amazing things, including the Drumpfinator addon.

    What is that URL, though? I’m guessing I’m know it if I (happily) watch the episode?

    • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 hours ago

      He can’t because he wasn’t born here, but we could totally elect his wife and let him do the whole first husband thing while still advising if she needs it.

      • Majestic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You do know his wife is a Republican right? A proud Bush/Obama era Republican? They literally met at the GOP convention in 2008.

        What is with liberals and playing fantasy games with politics? On the one hand liberals will say elections are important and have consequences and on the other they’ll treat it like a game of putting in your celebrity faves without bothering to care about their actual views.

        Who knows what Jon himself actually thinks given he married a proud Republican and the fact he’s a TV comedian playing a character. For all you know deep down he could personally be a never-Trump Republican himself.

        • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          All I was doing was correcting a misconception and giving the actual path to what they wanted.

          Nowhere did I say it was good or bad or whether I supported it.

          Please take your words out of my mouth and keep them in yours.

    • OneTwoThree@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well, I get that Lemmy is an alternative social media, but it’s not really an alternative to Facebook. Anonymous usernames, text-based posts, you can’t follow people, Fediverse is somewhat confusing… I’d recommend it as an alternative to Reddit, but probably not the website where boomers want to check up on their neighbors and friends

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I reckon Lemmy is actually pretty good. I wouldn’t know if the mobile apps are good, because I don’t use those - but for me the core functionality of Lemmy on my computer is smooth and functional. I don’t see any obvious low-hanging-fruit.

        • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I ditched reddit for Lemmy during the whole API crackdown bs. I’ve only used Voyager, but it seems quite comparable to RIF, which is the only way I ever viewed reddit.

          • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I used RIF, but ended up using Jerboa for some random reason I can’t remember. Will check out Voyager.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Lemmy is good for the size. It took a while for Lemmy to adjust to its current scale, with major instances having uptime issues.

          If we keep the servers up, there is still issues with spam and moderation. We don’t have the tools that Reddit built and I expect further pushes towards defederation as the standard for users hasn’t been developed.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t find Lemmy very palatable. I’m still here because I like to hear different perspectives. Lemmy as a whole seems to hate different perspectives, it’s like many go out of their way to keep it closer to a hive mind. 80% of the world’s people would not fit in here. I don’t either, but I don’t give a shit.

        • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Agree. I am not an open socialist and my top 5 issues probably don’t align with the usual stuff I see at the top of Lemmy communities. Still, it is a worthwhile source for some tech/privacy info and some other niche content.

        • gamer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s not just the tankie stuff. Tbf this place at times feels like the far left version of 4chan, and I say that as a very left person. Reddit’s upvote system has always had an issue with brigading/dog piling leading to hostile discussions and echo chambers. In Lemmy, the issue is worse because it feels like most of the people who were drawn here are deeply tied to that culture from Reddit. By contrast, Reddit has a lot more young and innocent people to soften things.

          I quit/deleted my Reddit account many years ago, before Lemmy’s rise in popularity. I just come here every once in a while because I like decentralized/fediverse stuff, but the Reddit formula really does turn me off. I can’t imagine the average person having the stomach for this brand of internet discussions, regardless of political leaning. It’s quite hostile and combative.

          • CMonster@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Idk, to me the comments on lemmy are generally less toxic and I feel like I see way more nuanced discussion than on reddit.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I am not sure quite sure what point you’re trying to make.

            If you people don’t care for social media, opt out

            However if you want social media there are two choices

            1. psyop bot farms running social media opinion shaping and other propaganda campaigns
            2. uncle Sunzu and tankies going on unhinged rants about capitalism and ruling class abuses.

            I think you are saying that most people prefer 1 despite saying they prefer freedom of expression.

            If you prefer freedom of expression, you gonna need to hear people duke it out online. That’s what’s a proper discussion means.

            If everyone just following what current psyop is, then sure everyone there agree on the talking points and if they don’t get they get censored out.

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Good, glad it’s getting some main stream attention. If more people start taking advantage of these settings and alternatives it’s going to hurt Meta’s bottom line eventually

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t want to get my hopes up but is this Facebook’s MySpace moment?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      So much of Facebook is just automated accounts responding to automated accounts in order to milk gullible advertisers. If everyone logged off tomorrow, I don’t know if Zuckerberg would notice.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 hours ago

        i have certainly notices a SHARP downturn of new content being added to insta and facebook by people i actually know over the last few years.

        All that seems to be left is AI Slop and ragebait. a venn diagram that overlaps considerably

      • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Seems like a win tbh. Meta stops influencing people and collecting their data, while dumbass corps waste money on ads nobody will see.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Meta will still influence people, because a lot of the influence is through news aggregators automatically ingesting what Facebook shows as “Trending” and regurgitates it elsewhere.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My personal MySpace moment for Facebook was 10 years ago. Best choice ever made.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 hours ago

      MySpace was way smaller than Facebook, it wasn’t even available where I am for most of its (meaningful) existence (I never had a MySpace despite being the exact target age range).

    • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not immediately or probably for some years. Facebook’s main problem is the fact its got an aging population and no young people joining. That’s why Meta bought Instagram and is desperate to get their grubby paws on TikTok or force it to close down in the West.

      I think internally, over the next decade, FB will start to die off organically as Meta put ever increasing focus on retention and young people.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t think so. There’s no good alternative to Facebook that is worth leaving it for. When MySpace died, there was a significantly better alternative (FB). Even if people quit using Facebook regularly, they’ll need to keep it.

      • then_three_more@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What do people use Facebook for these days? (I deleted my account about 10 years ago so I’m not sure what it’s for now)

        • sierramccharlie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I’ve been gone from FB for about 3 months but for me it was the groups. You could find groups for anything, but I miss my local groups most. Particularly the No-Buy and vegan and political activist groups. Finding an equivalent outside of FB is sub par, if it even exists at all.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m actually not sure what it is fb offers that people stay on it for. I find that you don’t need it to connect with actual friends. Even just making a Slack for close friends is a far better experience. It’s not great for finding news, it’s terrible for trying to have any sort of discussion. I genuinely don’t understand what purpose it serves.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    i like that people are leaving zucc platforms but why is that happening suddenly? did he do something exceedingly fascist? did i miss something?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Zuckerberg hung out with Trump at Mar a Lago and attended the inauguration, then got rid of Facebook and Instagram’s fact checking, relaxed their rules on posting hate speech and discrimination, ended Meta’s diversity initiatives, removed bathroom facilities at meta for transgender and nonbinary employees, made speeches in defence of Trump and expressed gratitude for finally being able to have “a productive partnership with the United States government”, while removing communications channels for employees and threatening them with being fired if they talked to media about any of this. He has gone full MAGA.

      This article covers some of it: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/30/technology/mark-zuckerberg-meta-trump.html

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        thats par for the course for facebook, no? they have always helped the fascists, in my country they literally helped elect one. they helped spread misinformation as if they already didnt care, and the diversity stuff feels just about the same brand of fake to me, so much hate in there.

        beggars cant be choosers though so i guess im just glad people are actually mad this time.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          They’ve gone full mask off, which is why there’s the sudden backlash. The hate speech rules now include a section that explicitly says that it’s okay to call LGBTQ people mentally ill. They’re the only group with a specific carve-out in the rules saying that it’s okay to post hate speech about them.

        • datavoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This is the first time zuck has gone full ass-kisser with curly hair and a gold chain, though

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            brazil. it was a cambridge analytica sort of deal, where the bad guys paid facebook to milimetrically target fascist propaganda, antivax sentiment, and a bunch of other bullshit on vulnerable people.

            they were happy to oblige and even interfered when we tried to regulate this away, a few years later. i hear they abuse it even further on SE asia.

            google did different but similarly heinous garbage to us.

    • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      He only now was able to catch up with all the news with Meta moderation from a month ago. He is only a couple weeks back on air.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      AFAIK no, but it takes awhile for everything to sink in, and hosts like John Oliver only have so much air time.

    • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The alternatives were suggested briefly in the segment, not the site. Oliver pointed to the site those people who can’t ditch Meta right now.

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’ve been wanting to try pixelfed but I haven’t figured out what to do: start my own for friends or join an existing one.

    I heard there were some issues with a dev or something so I haven’t signed up for the original instance yet

    • oldmansbeard@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’ve also been intrigued, but it seems like a harder jump to make than mastodon or lemmy. Like with twitter or Reddit I’m mostly interacting with strangers anyway, but I don’t really want my instagram to be photos of people I don’t know.

      Would you try to get your friends to make the switch with you?

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s why I’m considering hosting my own, unfederated instance

    • skribe@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Try one of the existing instances. Pixelfed.social is probably a bad choice right now, as it’s getting overloaded with new members and so importing from Instagram has been curtailed. The others at https://pixelfed.org/servers should be fine. If you later choose to host your own instance you can always move the data from your old one.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Are you able to stop your account from federating but subscribe to people who do federate? In other words, is there a way to create a private account

        • dissentiate@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Honestly, I don’t know. I’d suggest reaching out an admin of one of the instances that has the community guidelines that jive best with you. Their contact info is usually on the instance’s home page. They would definitely know.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Selling user profiling data is also worth money, even if you’re not shown ads because of ad-blockers you bring value to the dataset by increasing it’s size with useful demographic data.

      • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        But the thing is out of the big companies, basically none of them are in the business of selling the data they have. They are much better off if they don’t allow competitors to grow by keeping all the data to themselves.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          that’s why the broligarchs are buddying up to the dictators. the bottom is falling out of the surveillance capitalism market for advertising because it was never as effective as the ad marketplace brokers said it was. so the broligarchs need to sell their spying on us service to someone else and they’ve elected for the police state

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It looks like they got that list of tips from the EFF, who created Privacy Badger. So it’s not surprising they only recommended theirs. I agree though that they should include uBO in the list.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago
      • Not easy for most users on app-based mobile/tablet devices.

      • (Puts on tinfoil hat) His parent company, Discovery-Warner Bros, probably wouldn’t like that? And John Oliver makes his living through ad revenue.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          “Normal” people don’t use Facebook through the browser. Heck, I know functional, working adults, and reasonably smart kids, that don’t really understand the concept of a browser/URLs and just do everything through apps, bar the bare minimum for work.