John Oliver cited a 5000% rise in search queries related to leaving Meta and deleting accounts. Among the topics mentioned in the analysis, attention was drawn to early Facebook’s naivete with regard to moderation requirements, the constitutional framework, and a history of governmental interference.

Oliver debunks common right-wing “cry censorship” talking points, as well as the objective difficulty of moderation endeavors, and how direct threats by Trump may have influenced Zuckerberg’s turnaround.

Oliver went on to suggest Signal, Mastodon, Bluesky, and Pixelfed as alternatives that “do not seem as desperate to fall in line with Trump”. For those reluctant to completely ditch Meta, Oliver revealed a new site with step-by-step instructions to “make yourself less valuable to them”.

The guide was a collaboration with the EFF, and includes settings’ tweaks for Facebook and Meta, whose 98% of revenue comes from micro-targeting ads, the host previously cited, to increase privacy, and recommends Firefox, Privacy Badger, as “other measures” to take in order “to block advertisers and other third parties from tracking you”.

The segment culminated in a mock advert, in which the new Meta’s approach to moderation is coined as “Fuck it”, and hints to racism, internet scams, and calls to genocide running rampant on Meta’s platforms.

The clip reminds the origins of Facebook as a site to “rank college girls by hotness”, and its implication in genocide in Myanmar, which was more thoroughly discussed in an Oliver’s previous special on Facebook in 2018.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I am not sure quite sure what point you’re trying to make.

    If you people don’t care for social media, opt out

    However if you want social media there are two choices

    1. psyop bot farms running social media opinion shaping and other propaganda campaigns
    2. uncle Sunzu and tankies going on unhinged rants about capitalism and ruling class abuses.

    I think you are saying that most people prefer 1 despite saying they prefer freedom of expression.

    If you prefer freedom of expression, you gonna need to hear people duke it out online. That’s what’s a proper discussion means.

    If everyone just following what current psyop is, then sure everyone there agree on the talking points and if they don’t get they get censored out.