• M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Nothing wrong with different tastes or opinions that aren’t objectively bad. The issue is that do many people have objectively bad opinions. Things like racism, anti-lgbtq+, hate of anyone outside their religion, pedophilia, animal cruelty, etc. Those are objectively wrong opinions that need to be reacted to with strong opposition and taken as serious problems.

    • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sure but you can’t treat them as serious problems if you don’t understand why they exist.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s actually impossible for two people to have different reactions to something, no matter how different their beliefs or life experiences are. There are only two reasons a person might disagree with you, they’re being paid off by sinister forces or they’re a bot.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They can’t possibly hold a different opinion from me, it must be that they don’t truly understand! I’d better explain it again.

  • bryophile@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Context really matters.

    Although I agree these people are just annoying in most cases, not all disagreement is equally valid. In too many discussions today, facts get dismissed as “that’s just, like, your opinion, man.” Facts really should change your mind when explained well.

    It’s frustrating how predominant this anti-intellectualism has become. I get the tendency to think: “if you’d just educate yourself…”

    • IncogCyberSpaceUser@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’”

      -Isaac Asimov

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Facts don’t change people’s minds. The main thing that matters is “is the source in my in-group?”

      This is kind of a stupid way to live, but that’s the human baseline. So that’s how all the conservatives live, and why they won’t come around on things like climate change. They’re not listening to facts. They’re listening to their in-group.

      • bryophile@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes exactly, I know facts do not change people’s minds. I said facts SHOULD change people’s minds.

        I don’t think their inability to process facts and change their minds is a reason to stop trying, I think the rest of us giving up is dangerous and that is what is happening right now.

        • jtrek@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Right. I think winning moves might have to play into people’s emotions. Don’t tell conservatives that greenhouse gases cause more heat to be trapped. Tell them like ONLY AMERICA CAN DEFEAT PHYSICS AND MOVE INTO THE FUTURE or whatever.

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Why are people mad that Playstation is going full digital? I haven’t bought a game on a disc in years”

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Kinda depends on what you’re talking about. Most things sure, others are legit kinda fucked full stop regardless.

      • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I disagree. Physical interaction is necessary for real empathy. People should get offline more, volunteer, hangout out with their community. Just seeing a person’s face, even over video conference charges interactions.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I meant everything online, yes meeting people in person (or treating them with more humanity when online) are good ways to see the humanity in others. You might not like them, but you’ll get them a little better.

  • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s also why we can’t move forward.

    “Welcome to Lemmy, how leftist are you?”

    the answer is “not enough”

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not sure exactly which policies you’re referring to, but if it’s the main one which is workers owning the tools that produce value, it’s hardly surprising that a bunch of people who weren’t cool with a big centralized corporation making decisions without consulting them would feel that way.