Lemmy’s design is focused on quality content by ditching the Karma farmers and addicts. No more chasing upvotes—people here actually focus on real value instead of feeding the ego.

EDIT: I know there are upvotes and downvotes, but the problem with Reddit is you can’t post in most communities if your karma or reputation is bad. This is a big problem because herd mentality prevails there and if ypu have unpopular opinions you’re basically censored.

Lemmy isn’t designed to milk ypur dopamine with notifications every 10 upvotes, so you focus more on posting valuable cont instead of farming for approval and upvotes.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean there are upvotes and downvotes so I don’t know what you mean. But there isn’t a real incentive to have lots of upvotes on here. I’m not even sure why karma farming even is a thing on reddit. Maybe cause you can sell the account to whatever guy wants to buy it?

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not crazy if you want to advertise on the down low. I worked a summer once doing that shit, it’s insidious. Blockers don’t even block someone pretending to like a product.

    • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s because Reddit specifically optimizes the site so that upvotes give you the maximum dopamine and keep you hooked on it like a crack. Most corporate social media thrive on keeping their users hooked through cheap tricks.

      Lemmy Marxist Leninist Stalinist Maoist dev on the other hand doesn’t care or isn’t even able to do this because he doesn’t have an army of psychology experts to design it that way

      So no you don’t get anything out of karma but your brain thinks you do and every aspect of the site is built to maximise this. I hate it

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    There can be many reasons reddit sucks, but I’d argue its mostly because Spez is a mega douche and Reddit was captured by mods who had agendas and just silenced anyone who disagreed. Or they were paid to do it.

  • AnarchiaKapitany@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh my sweet summer child. EVERY new service and SocMed site starts out like this. Fresh, fun, and working properly. Until the masses show up. That’s when it goes to shit.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        You could do that if you wanted, but if we had these moderation things will probably be fine. It’s also Eternal September

    • noot_noot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yep, it’s just a matter of time till karma system is getting implemented on here too

      • afronaut@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why make this assumption? Is there a reason you believe we need that karma system? I genuinely can’t think of any reason, outside of corporate interest to push engagement.

        • noot_noot@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yep, any sort of karma system is needed to get the masses to join somewhere. To attract the majority of people you need something that keep them interested. Karma on reddit is the same as likes on Facebook or Instagram

          • afronaut@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Horrible take. I absolutely do not give a fuck about arbitrary internet points and would like to see an open discussion without a majority bias downvoting someone into oblivion just because they disagree. For example, your comment will not be hidden just because your comment is being downvoted.

            The only thing bringing profile karma to Lemmy will do is attract botters to inflate their credibility. Those could also be used to downvote others so the botter’s comments and posts are pushed to the top.

            Again, horrible idea.

        • finder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I genuinely can’t think of any reason, outside of corporate interest to push engagement.

          On Reddit, I found that blocking people by account age and link karma noticeably improved the site. edit: For example, blocking 1 year old accounts with more than 100k link karma. /edit Mostly helped me filter out karma farmers from my feed that did nothing but repost memes or low effort shitposts.

          Of course, not having total karma publicly tracked might make reposting a nonissue.

          • afronaut@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Of course you can see the comment’s individual karma. But, if you got my profile or yours, there is not accumulated karma.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I just wanted to let everyone know there is an option in your settings so you don’t see upvotes or downvotes.

    None of these imaginary points fucking matter.

    So why don’t you do yourself a favor and uncheck these boxes and not give a fuck what others think about your comment.

    I know I have.

    (Lemmy is rad as fuck)

  • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think the only way to really fix this is to make votes a limited asset that accounts have. There are forums where this has worked okay: bodybuilding.com forums has a reputation system where accounts are limited in what they can give to other voters.

    As long as “karma” is unlimited it suffers from the same problems whether you count it in aggregate or not. As some other commenters have said, people still seek validation in individual comments. I know because I do too.

    • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Seeking validation apparently is core human trait so I am not sure if it is possible to avoid it at all. Still as you probably know social media corporations keep us hooked to their crack using it and amplifying the base value

      Funnily, ironically some Lemmy apps copy Reddit UX (that was designed by psychology experts) and thus make it more addictive than it is on the web app.

      Best bet to avoid social candy crack is to use lemmy from terminal if that is possible, or default site

      • Pregnenolone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would imagine if you made karma points limited on the spender side rather than unlimited, then it might make users “try harder” to get validation, thus improving the quality of content on average.

        Or it all could be bullshit and fail. Hard to say. You are right though, it’s all manufactured for engagement.

  • henry1917@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Honestly, karma is just for getting started on reddit. Certain subreddits, require your account to exist and have a certain amount of karma to “validate” it. I don’t think people care about getting karma beyond that point.

  • Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I did count my likes from some top liked comments or posts of mine before. It kinda feels the same as karma, to me.

    I’d say that people always find some way to get addicted to something, in whatever.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.comBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    No, there’s karma. I’ve had more than a couple guys point out mine is negative.

    • Pamasich@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      For context for the people downvoting this: Lemmy doesn’t have karma, but Mbin does and it shows karma for Lemmy accounts too.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think some apps will request all of your comment history and manually calculate karma but it’s not tracked by lemmy

          • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Wooo, that’s super cool. Do I have any tags? Tell me tell me. Make a pink one

            Tho these tags are shared yes? Imagine shared community built tags like some yelp reviews of people. Actually that’s a terrible idea so it will probably happen.

            Augmented Reality Community Driven People Scoring System.
            I don’t talk to anyone lower than 7 or who was marked by users as <opposite political party>

            Better yet. Automatically ban anyone with lower than 5

            Ugh too much coffee, too many stimulants

            Still it sucks so that’s probably the future. you can’t even opt out because even if you don’t have the AR glasses everyone else has.

            The only hope for the future is to be a hacker. Achieve a cozy AI-proof job as a security consultant and use the skills to enhance your life.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I wonder what you thought was evil. Probably something banal, but something Lemmy hates.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.comBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            That makes sense. I still hold the opinion that illegal immigrants should be deported, and Hamas is awful.

            Most people would agree with me, but most on Lemmy would not

  • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just don’t be a woman on Lemmy.

    Sure, most people won’t downvote or harass you just for being a woman (a lot will… we didn’t get the best of Reddit at all, and I doubt the new adoptees are any better…) but they will often enough make things difficult even if they aren’t actively causing problems.

    But men of Lemmy (aka the vast majority of the user base since they ran off all the womenfolk) don’t care. They see that as quality control or some dumb shit, because THEY aren’t interested in woman things, so nobody should be, or they think their “as a man” comments should be important or some shit… Whatever the post is about. If it doesn’t cater to them, it can fuck right off.

    Which is why cis women make up <10% of the Lemmy side of the fediverse. It’s a disaster for women here.

    But I wonder how long you’ve been here. Most of the posts of this nature are from very new accounts and they don’t know the problems yet…

    • fossilesque@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve not had a problem here, do you have examples of this? Not saying it does not exist, more curious as I’ve found this space a lot kinder than reddit.

    • Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Which is why cis women make up <10% of the Lemmy side of the fediverse. It’s a disaster for women here.”

      I mean I can believe that since it’s based off of Reddit but do you have a source for that?

    • amos@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is this really the case? I find this unexpected. Lemmy seems to be friendly to the LGBTQ people, namely trans.

      If what you say is true, we should probably address it somehow.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The downvotes prove your point. This topic needs more discussion, but most of the times when women bring this up, their comments get downvoted to hell. It’s quite a “gotcha” for someone to ask to see “examples” when most of the examples we’ve come across or created will be buried or have since been deleted.

      Alternative question - for those that don’t believe this is an issue, when is the last time you came across a post on Lemmy that is specifically for/about women or women’s issues (especially one posted from a woman’s perspective)? Or even better, go ahead and make such a post. Watch how fast the downvotes come.

      I expect this comment to be downvoted the same way as the parent comment was, the same way that past posts I’ve made and read about women’s issues have been downvoted on Lemmy. If men want this place to be inclusive for women, they have to do their part to support us - not downvoting our concerns, simply because they don’t experience the same issues, is the absolute bare minimum. Otherwise, why would we keep posting/commenting about our issues when doing so invites a downvote cascade?

      • merdaverse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I just got downvoted for asking for an example of this. I have been using Lemmy quite a bit in the last month (way more than I should) and I have never come across what you’re talking about. I might be wrong, I haven’t seen all the posts created on Lemmy, that is why I’m asking for an example.

        If I make the claim that 4chan is full of racist, nazi fucks, that is easy to verify and provide examples of in a few minutes. Similarly, the burden of proof should be on the one making the claim.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, the downvotes are because nobody was victimizing her here but she went off on a rant and called me horrible things that I don’t deserve to be called. Sexism can go in any direction and I don’t tolerate any of it.

      • btaf45@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        when is the last time you came across a post on Lemmy that is specifically for/about women or women’s issues

        The same amount of time I came across a post that is about men’s issues. A really long time. The vast majority of comments should not be about identity politics, unless it is a feature of the specific community.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Alternative question - for those that don’t believe this is an issue, when is the last time you came across a post on Lemmy that is specifically for/about women or women’s issues (especially one posted from a woman’s perspective)? Or even better, go ahead and make such a post. Watch how fast the downvotes come.

        I’m not going to say it isn’t a problem, but this was just the other day and while engagement could have been better it didn’t seem to be met with downvotes and pushback.

    • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s how it is anywhere that doesn’t have any real moderation. There are those actively seek to harass anyone who isn’t right leaning cis hetero white male. Lemmy like every other modern social platform is an open air forum available to the entire 7 billion population of the world. Moderators don’t see 99% of the posts. And 99% of what they do see, they don’t take for than a few seconds to consider. The nefarious abusers are almost always more subtle than moderators give thought to. This allows harassment to run rampant. This is a fundamental issue with social media. As as I’m concerned it’s an intractable problem (brought you by free speech absolutist libertarian bros).

      That’s as opposed to the traditional internet boards where posting was orders of magnitude lower volume. Site administrators and moderators cared about fostering a good community. Moderators saw a not insignificant portion of the content posted. Not just reports. Forum members used one pseudonym. No throwaways like the reddit/lemmy paradigm. What you posted was attached to you as a person. Therefore there was consequences to being an asshole. In other words deterrence.

      Also I find it kind of amusing how they out themselves for their simpleton world view. I’ve noticed a pattern where they take superficial readings of a post to identify keywords/phrases. Then assign identity to that user. Then engage in harassment based on that.

      For example say I posted something that was sympathetic to women. Ergo they assume I am a woman. And they engage the usual framework of belligerent replies appropriate to that assumed identity. I know for certain the key words in the second sentence of this comment already has triggered someone for sure.

      Edit: The prior replies are just *chefs kiss*. I can’t tell if they’re being intentional or if they’re just that dumb. I guess that’s part of the fun isn’t it.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I know multiple IRL women who don’t share your complaints about Lemmy. Maybe people are shitty to you because you’re shitty to them.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lemmy still relies on upvotes for ranking the feed, so, farming them makes sense, it’s just isolated per each post.

    And I believe the issue might get worse as Lemmy grows. The reason Reddit came up with karma and all that is because the more people you have on your platform, the more baddies you have to account for.

    For now, Lemmy is small enough for a basic interpersonal reputation to mostly just work, but as it grows, we need something else. Presumably, not karma.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is no algorithm at all as far as I know, for better or worse. The closest is the “Scaled” sorting option, which takes community size into account to help boost smaller communities. But I’d hardly call that an algorithm, even though it technically is.

        There is no point in farming upvotes here apart from feeding your brain’s dopamine response.

      • gon [he]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think they meant on a post-by-post basis. You can’t farm account karma, but you can farm upvotes on individual posts, for ego, I guess…

        There is the vibe-check on Lemmy, though. I don’t believe the algorithm takes that into account.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Piefed implements an “attitude” system which tracks up vote ratio and a few other simple metrics mods can use to identify bad actors

      • btaf45@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        “bad actors” simply means “unpopular or politically incorrect opinions”. Fuck that.

    • merdaverse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s multiple sorting types that you can choose for your feed. How do you want your content ordered?

  • Bonus @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can’t say I ever cared about karma. Lemmy reminds me of stripped down original reddit. Almost original. I remember when Reddit didn’t even have thumbnails. Back then, there was a thing called memepool. You didn’t know what you were going to get when you clicked on links on either site. There was a lot of fun unpredictable content and Reddit still meant you read it and we’re vouching for it. It was like this whole world of quality stuff from really smart people. Thumbnails and subreddits ushered in a series of trashings and lead to intense divisiveness reddit never recovered from. . .

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lemmy is small enough, that without even seeing a karma total, some users have an unofficial “rapport”, where I’ve seen them around enough to recognize whether they are the type to go against the grain, a perpetual troll, or a usually reasonable person with an unusually spicy take.