• Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    while (true) { print(money) }

    isn’t that just crypto mining?

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Socrates said books were dumbing down humanity because, since people could just look things up in books they wouldn’t have to memorise information anymore, and that made their brains soft.

    Ever since society began, some people have been convinced the next generation’s technology was going to be society’s downfall, whether it was Socrates’ books, the telegraph in the 1800s, radio, the (land line) telephone, dishwashers (women will become lazy and unsuitable wives and mothers), screened windows (society will collapse because you won’t hear your neighbours and pedestrians on the street, we’ll all become hermits and die holed up in our homes), comic books would rot the brains of the youth, then music, then video games… it goes on and on.

    So far, those predictions have never been true. Every older generation freaks out when the ones after come of age. It’s like societal growing pains.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Some technologies actually have had unintended side effects, but not always the ones we saw coming. Artificial lights are killing all the insects which nobody really worried about and cars do kill tons of people, which we worried about in the 1920s. I don’t know what the deal was with leaded gasoline, that one was just bizarre.

      All in all, it’s just really hard to anticipate how society and technology will interact. We think about the environment now but I don’t know if any systematic progress has been made on predicting the human factor.

      screened windows (society will collapse because you won’t hear your neighbours and pedestrians on the street, we’ll all become hermits and die holed up in our homes)

      This one has actually come true to a certain measurable degree (see Bowling Alone, written at what is now the midpoint of the trend), but I don’t think it’s down to window screens.

  • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can someone explain this joke to me

    “I’m writing a recursive method with threads to optimize the CPU usage in a 0.02%

    I understand everything apart from the “in a 0.02%”. What does that mean? How can something be in a percentage?

  • whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This could be so much longer.

    Killing children, class systems, so many programming language names, the ridiculous ways equality and order-of-operations are done sometimes. Plenty of recursion jokes to be made. Big O notation. Any other ideas?

    • snowbell@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is a difficult meme template but when done right the payoff is hilarious. But yeah.