• Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Thank You, BotM! I migrated here from the corporate social medias as soon as I was aware. I’m still transferring my OC over from IG (not an easy task) to Pixelfed. And I use similar talking points to inform people, often about the very existence of a non-comercial social media. Very few people, maybe 2, since July '23 have even heard of the Fediverse. We shall persist!

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I truly believe the fediverse is the future. People will tire of the AI and all that nonsense and fade away from all the big sites.

    • JohnnyH842@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m just learning about Pixelfed from your comment. Any suggestions on where to start or instances to subscribe to?

      • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I signed on to https://social.photo/. And I’m sure I had darned good reasons for doing so at the time. LoL With federation, I’m not really sure it matters which instance one signs onto, as long as it’s not some tankie/nazi crap, of course. And of course one could self host one’s own instance.

        It appears to me that, because of the absence of advertising, it is incumbent upon individuals to ‘evangelize’ and spread the fedi-gospel. :-D

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “the future of social media” reminds me of “the year of the Linux desktop”. Like, what does that mean to you?

    The most obvious explanation is that you think it will overtake corporate social media entirely. Or even exist anywhere on the same level. But that seems unrealistic.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Hard to tell imo. Big tech has a lot of big advantages and disadvantages over us.

      Being centralized and heavily funded, it’s a lot easier for them to rapidly create/change new things, for better or for worse. It also means they do a lot of the testing for us. Mastodon/Lemmy formats are figured out from what we liked from proprietary platforms, then we kept the core that made it good. We also don’t need to make a worse user experience by worrying about monetization.

      We also have a lot less development, and I won’t even pretend that Mastodon or Lemmy are anywhere near well developed as Reddit/Twitter backends and other software. We simply don’t have the attention and funding to be anywhere near that level.

      I don’t think we’ll ever replace big tech, but I just hope we stay on a healthy trajectory where we are alongside them in popularity.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, but we’ve been on this stressful ride before, and we know where it ends.

      There were lots of attempts at a closed source proprietary Internet protocol. They have all resoundly failed, after looking unbeatable. Some folks still fondly remember the closed Internet protocols like OLE COM, ActiveX, Flash, Cold Fusion, and SilverLight, but few of us miss them. Okay, I do miss Flash games.

      Good touchscreen phone operating systems were a “will this ever be matched?” trade secret at Blackberry and Apple. Now the vast majority of phones run open source Android.

      Much earlier, most good-enough C compilers were expensive proprietary closed source products. Now I see very little being compiled on anything other than the free and open source GCC. Even most other programming languages and tools are now FOSS, as well. I can’t think of much for development that cracks the top 20 that isn’t FOSS. JetBrains IDEs stand out as a lone closed source hold-out.

      Open standards always win, in the end.

      The desktop computing default is honestly way overdue to switch to FOSS. That’s why it’s the year of the Linux desktop.

      The Fediverse is here to stay, and is all that’ll be left in a couple decades. But in the meantime, it’s cozy!

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Now the vast majority of phones run open source Android.

        to be fair, this was almost certainly a reaction to the iphone. Still open, so there’s that.

        Seems like the cycle is either:

        • someone has a good idea, it’s open source.
        • someone has a good idea, it’s closed source, someone else makes something similar, but open source.
        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yep. It often takes quite awhile. And I honestly don’t mind supporting innovators who want to sell something closed but really good.

          But as I get older, and watch the pattern over and over, I’m starting to appreciate skipping the cycle by directly adopting the open thing as early as I can.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            yeah, the general rule of thumb seems to be that if it’s universal, it needs to be open. The farther niche it goes, the less open it has to be, on principle of utility. Open standards are only good people it’s so easy for them to get accepted. That’s why closed standards often just don’t go very far.

            • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              The farther niche it goes, the less open it has to be, on principle of utility.

              That’s a great point! I kind of skipped over, that. Good add, thanks.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                it’s a rather weird concept, but it makes sense. If you want to standardize, let’s say, threaded hardware across the continental US that you would inherently need to do away with any closed standards, assuming you want it to actually work, and along with that, whatever you settle on, needs to be open.

                You could theoretically do this with closed source, but the problem here is that there will be someone that comes along and does it with open source, and if it’s better, you’re fucked. And if it’s equal, and cheaper, you’re fucked. And if it’s marginally worse, but trivial to adopt, you’re fucked.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They have all resoundly failed, after looking unbeatable

        “Failed” how? Failed in that they sucked to use, yeah. Failed as in people stopped using them? No. Failed as in their profits plummeted? No. Their users are gluttons for abuse and exploitation. And their users are nearly everyone I know. They don’t care.

        Now the vast majority of phones run open source Android.

        No they don’t. It’s only ~50% of the US market and ~60% of the global market. Also at the time it was a very competitive market and OEMs like Nokia and Motorola all had their day. That hasn’t been true since the original iPhone some 15 years ago.

        Open standards always win, in the end.

        LOL no they don’t? In fact they almost always don’t.

        The desktop computing default is honestly way overdue to switch to FOSS.

        It will never be, for the same reason it has a whopping 4% today. It’s complicated and difficult to use, and no one is spending money on marketing to convince people to even try it.

        The Fediverse…is all that’ll be left in a couple decades.

        That’s nothing but a wild utopian delusion…

        Honestly, I wish it were true. I wish you were right. I wish people respected themselves to take the time and learn about all the corporations that are fucking up their lives, and to take the time and learn how to take the according action, but at best they don’t care, and more often then not they will actually go out of their way to defend the corporations that are fucking them. If they cared, the corporations wouldn’t be able to fuck them, and we would live in a completely different world.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Failed" how? Failed as in people stopped using them? No. Failed as in their profits plummeted? No.

          What the actual fuck?

          I gave several concrete examples whose usage was originally seen as unassailable, and is now easily measured as essentially zero.

          Of the examples I listed, only Shockwave still has any publicly recorded examples of actual continued use, because there’s a virtual museum dedicated to preserving it’s memory.

          That’s a fine definition of a failed technology.

          You’re out of your element, Donny.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            My guy, you are completely overreacting.

            OLE COM, ActiveX, Flash, Cold Fusion, and SilverLight

            I don’t know what any of these things are but I’m pretty sure they’re not popular social media platforms. If you don’t understand why that matters then you have a fundamental lack of understanding of the situation as it stands.

            You’re out of your element, Donny.

            …who? are you talking to?

            • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              who? are you talking to?

              Sorry. Movie quote. The Big Labowski. Check it out. It’s fun. For context, the guy that says that line is a blowhard, not to be taken too seriously. (Like me!)

              I don’t know what any of these things are but I’m pretty sure they’re not popular social media platforms. If you don’t understand why that matters then you have a fundamental lack of understanding of the situation as it stands.

              I understand network effects. All of my examples had large network effects supporting them, in their time.

              Seriously. Open standards win. It takes flipping forever sometimes. But they do. Check into the screwdriver thing. It’s a cool read. Or for something more recent, the histories of open and closed web browsers. I think you’ll find it encouraging.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Open standards win. It takes flipping forever sometimes. But they do.

                Did XMPP win? Did RSS win? Did Linux win? These open standards have been around for decades and are still not widely adopted. At what point are they considered a failure?

                Is ActivityPub winning? At best it has stalled after gaining a few defectors like myself from those who are unwilling to tolerate bullshit. But at this point I think it’s abundantly clear that there is no amount of abuse that the majority of users won’t tolerate on proprietary platforms.

                When open standards win, it’s usually because the platform was built on them, like email or podcasts.

                • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Did XMPP win?

                  That remains to be seen. I’ll gladly accept XMPP as a point in the “against” column, as it has a long way to go, if it succeeds.

                  Google succeeded handily at their last round of embrace, extend, extinguish, against XMPP, by dropping support from Google Chat.

                  It’s worth noting that the question isn’t really whether XMPP replaces WhatsApp, it’s whether it can unseat SMS.

                  SMS is seriously entrenched. I don’t know it’s state of openess. My understanding is it’s mostly run/owned by a few large proprietary players.

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS

                  Again, I’m happy to concede that XMPP looks doomed today, like RSS did a couple decades ago.

                  Did RSS win?

                  RSS certainly hasn’t won, yet. But RSS is doing fine, behind the scenes. Most of the RSS the average person interacts with doesn’t look, to them, like RSS. There’s a lot of RSS still in wide use, today. Competing solutions are currently enshitifying (Google Search, Reddit, Facebook, Xitter), while RSS is still free and still just works.

                  That’s not an automatic win for RSS, until you consider that RSS has already outlived WebCrawler, Digg, MySpace and GeoCities, among others.

                  I’m calling it early in favor of RSS.

                  We’ve agreed that I am prone to do so, though.

                  Did Linux win?

                  Yes. Linux won. The vast majority of computation today runs on Linux.

                  Windows used to hold a serious percentage of web hosting. My best guess is it was around half. The current percentage is unknown, but generous estimates put it at 3%, at most. For some context, the Azure cloud (Microsoft’s web hosting that Office 365 runs on) is known to mostly run on Linux.

                  But to address the other part of your question:

                  Is Windows desktop going away?

                  Something mostly proprietary that costs money and is called Windows with be with us for a long time.

                  But the Windows kernel is counting it’s final days now, while most people haven’t noticed.

                  The Windows kernel is cool, but it’s a pure cost center and no longer offers anything that Linux doesn’t.

                  Game developers noticed, this year. I personally, held onto Windows desktop for decades, solely for gaming. I suspect the shift this year will turn out to be a key moment in the spin down of the Windows kernel.

                  A desktop OS has a ton of moving pieces. We’re currently seeing the natural trend for those pieces to take advantage of existing open solutions.

                  I predict that we will see more and more of that, until the switching cost reaches the current low cost of switching web browsers.

  • ironsoap@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    For Lemmy.world a donation would help keep it alive without all the crap. Servers are cheaper then they were, but still not cheap.

    Ko-Fi (Donate)

    Bunq (Donate)

    Open Collective backers and sponsors

    Patreon

    Liberapay patrons

    • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      OMG! Thank you so much ❤️❤️❤️

      It’s not easy keeping things up sometimes, but we’re always looking for ways to deliver more for less, while still keeping things snappy.

      It’s hard, but without the community, we would just be some nerds with too much time on our hands 😅

      Much love for y’all!!!

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah but on the other hand Lemmy world sucks and it would be good for the overall health of the Fediverse if they ran out of money and had to shut down. Give that donation to a smaller instance who actually needs it. World is already the biggest and they don’t need to get bigger.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think we should be wishing for the demise of the largest Lemmy instance. However, I definitely agree that focusing resources towards growing small and medium sized instances is good for the fediverse.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    considering that this is a bsd user, yeah makes sense.

    Coming from a self hoster, shits up when it’s up. Otherwise it’s down.

    I charge nothing and you expect no guarantees of service :)

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What I like about the fedi is I don’t care if it’s a “success” in the same sense that the closed social media sites have to be. It’s not like this project has quarterly profit targets to hit or else it’ll have to enshittify or else the investors pull out and we’re all screwed because there’s no more app.fediverse.com monolith or whatever.

    Nah it’s just us doing our thing and enjoying ourselves. The activity around here already reached a critical mass a while ago, to the point that there’s more content than I could hope to enjoy, so anything from here is vegan gravy.