UK police arrested five men close to an airbase in England that is used by US long-range bombers on suspicion of terror and explosives offenses.

Army bomb disposal units are at the scene while dozens of houses nearby have been evacuated as a precaution with the investigation ongoing.

The arrests were made after information was received from residents in the area soon after midnight, according to Richard Ocone, a senior detective in the county of Gloucestershire. The men have not been identified and no clue has been given about a possible motive.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Attacking the military or police isn’t terrorism, that’s warfare, original recipe.

    Double-tap bombing of elementary schools is terrorism.

    But of course I’m stupid and pedantic. Terrorist is something you are, not something you did.

    • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      15 hours ago

      No, terrorism is something you do.

      Attacking the military or police of a country you’re not at war with to force your political or ideological goals is terrorism.

      The US also committing terrorism doesn’t change this.

        • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Terrorism.

          It doesn’t stop being terrorism because it’s a cause you agree with. It’s an action using violence to force a political, ideological, or social change through fear.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Breaking stuff you don’t agree with isn’t terrorism, it’s just regular crime. They (seemingly from the sparse information being released) weren’t attacking politicians or voters to change political choices. A crime being allegedly ideologically motivated or against government property doesn’t make it terrorism.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        you’re not at war with

        Even in your own definition, you have to make a cut-out so that terrorism is OK when army guys do it. Again, you’re drawing a distinction from identity, not action.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The UK has so overused the terrorism designation that my first assumption on reading the headline is that this is bullshit.

      • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s never been a serious term. When they started calling 9/11 terrorism I was like OK we’ve been doing that to other countries like, ALOT so we should stfu and take the loss.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Guard: “Vy russkiye shpionov?”

      Daniel: “Nyet.”

      Jack: “Daniel?”

      Daniel: “He just asked if we were Soviet spies, I just…”

      Daniel stops mid-sentence as Jack gives him the look of disapproval.