non-exclusive

That means we can license all our content to another company, and Reddit would be forced to allow them to fetch it, as we still own it, right?

This made me cry. For so many reasons

It more closely means “get rid of” or “throw away”. If you 86 a plate of ribs, you throw them away, you don’t shoot them.

Source: common jargon in restaurants and the military. I have worked in both.

Seriously impressed your still doing this

Interesting. Didn’t know they could allocate funds without Congress.

100% this.

Can you hit a tree with a rock while naked I’6m the programming language?

What’s wrong with Rust?

I mean, when you remove the toxicity, it’s a great single-player game.

Ignore the thousands of hours I have in the game.

While I appreciate your frustration regarding all the USA news, that’s the news that is posted to !news@lemmy.world

If you would like to see news from other nations in this FEDERATED community, feel free to post news from around the globe.

I wish you the best.

No idea. That’s why I’m impressed

What impressed me was the way they faked when the message was sent. It said the message was a week old.

We do allow [META] posts, when in good faith and on topic.

Allowing this to stay up.

You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.

You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.

My gut says he’s going to use the ethics in government act as an excuse to dump.

Not as much as you’d think.

Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran

• https://hilariouschaos.com/u/universalmonk
• https://futurology.today/u/universalmonk
• https://lemdro.id/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.radio/u/universalmonk
• https://eviltoast.org/u/universalmonk
• https://sh.itjust.works/u/universalmonk
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/swp
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/pierpontctc
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/politicsunfiltered
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/solarpunkstrength
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/fitchicks
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/lostscreams
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/libertariansocialism
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/esperanto
• https://slrpnk.net/u/universalmonk
  • https://slrpnk.net/c/solarpunkstrength
• https://mander.xyz/u/universalmonk
• https://midwest.social/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://midwest.social/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
• https://lemm.ee/u/universalmonk
  • https://lemm.ee/c/talesfromthedark
  • https://lemm.ee/c/swp
  • https://lemm.ee/c/pierpontctc
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byupathway
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemm.ee/c/politicsunfiltered
• https://beehaw.org/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
• https://lemmy.world/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered (TAKEN OVER BY ANOTHER MOD)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/PierpontCTC
  • https://lemmy.world/c/transracial
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byupathway
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemmy.world/c/swp
  • https://lemmy.world/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://lemmy.world/c/amileaday
  • https://lemmy.world/c/murderhornet_100

If it’s a bug, wow. Almost 250 years, and they can’t fix it?

Also, judges are there to make sure both sides play by the rules.

It’s actually the conclusion of 2 things:

• Double Jeopardy means your cannot try someone twice for the same crime
• A juror cannot be held accountable for a decision they make

If both hold true, then logically, a jury can make a decision against legal precedent, without fear of repercussion - unless they are paid/coerced to come to that conclusion, and the defendant - once cleared by by a jury - cannot be tried again.

This means that legally, a jury can say GTFO to jury instructions set by judges.