Locking this down.

Too many heated comments

tsonfeir reported this comment because you quoted his comment, which broke community rules.

Same thing as fair use - you weren’t making the comment, you were arguing against the comment. Leaving it. tsonfeir can deal with the shame of his words.

Gave them a 7-day ban for that comment, plus trying to win an argument via reporting you.

There’s got to be easier ways…

the modlogs show that we do take action, but only when justified. Just because you feel something is justified, that doesn’t mean you’re right.

A report doesn’t mean you’ll get what you want. Moderators will review the report, and see if it has merit.

Insulting us is the best way to make us do our job /s

I understood from the outset. Have a great day!

Ah yeah. Please explain how that is a personal attack. They surmised that something must be affecting your taste buds if you find that the two drinks taste the same. That would be an accurate summation if they feel the two taste very dissimilar.

I didn’t get personal. Sorry if you took it personally.

I actually agree with Treczoks about them not tasting remotely the same.

My wife gets the extra creamy oat milk. I can easily tell it’s not regular milk, and it’s just not for me. I honestly tried to like it.

It throws frozen lemons at your party, that heal on contact

Compelling speech is a violation of the first amendment.

Yeah, I wish they could force it, but they can’t. They might be able to come to an agreement between both parties that if the defendant did XYZ, the plaintiff would reduce damages by X amount.

I don’t see that happening, though.

It’s amazing what people can turn into an insult.

I live in a “flyover state”. What does that say about me?

I mean, surely it means something, or you said it for no reason.

Please, psychoanalyze me based on where I live.

There is no such onus. If you don’t want to go through a paywall, feel free to find an alternate source.

3 deputy U.S. Marshalls killed. 8 total officers wounded/dead. They were serving a warrant against someone having a gun that isn’t allowed to. 1 accused dead. Others in custody.

Bad response, but not a racial slur - means idiot Cajun.

Restored, but take your downvotes

In their defense:

I wasn’t arguing with you about what they say NOW. I was pointing you to what they literally said THEN.

You said “a well regulated militia didn’t mean the same thing back then”

I merely pointed you to the founders own words to show you that you were wrong.

It wasn’t an amendment. It was baked into the first article.

You pointing out the RECENT supreme court ruling was a bad faith argument against my rebuttal.

Your comment has been reported, but as you had links and appeared to be arguing in good-faith, I decided to leave it. With that said, I completely disagree with your words.

Review Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 15-16.

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Militia was what we now call “National Guard”. Speaking from experience, as a former guardsman as well as vet in 2 other branches. Back when I went to basic, this was well discussed as a given. I’m surprised people think otherwise to this day.