• DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Those soldiers went in after the bombings. You’re inaccurately implying that they should have gone in without air support, which would have caused massive casualties to their side.

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          In war, yes, it should be unsurprising that one’s own forces are considered more important to protect than enemy forces, or civilians from a hostile nation.

            • DarkGamer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I edited my comment to be more clear and concise, but you replied too soon, I had a feeling you’d interpret that phrase in the least charitable way possible.

              Civilians from a hostile nation is more accurate, although widespread public support of intifada doesn’t mean you’re entirely wrong. Despite this, israel is still choosing military targets, unlike their opponent.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                How exactly should have I interpreted the phrase “enemy civilians?” What is the charitable interpretation of that phrase?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Gaza is not an enemy nation. It is not even a nation. This is supposed to be a war between Israel and Hamas. Not Israel and the Palestinian people. You are still saying all those children’s deaths were justified.