• lazylemons@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have always been nervous about this type of thing happening with the AUR. Thankfully many packages I used to need the AUR for have since added native versions or made flatpaks. I hope AUR users don’t have too many issues from this!

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      flatpaks arn’t any safer and with how poor the sandbox is handled by 99% of devs. Hell flatpaks have a new issue every other month. Its almost more often to see a new flatpak problem then aur problem.

      Its literally no safer in reality sure on paper its safer but reality has proven that flatpaks just are not some magical fix to this problem.

      Hell half the time when flatpaks do have issues they go unaddressed or fixed for months after they are found. While AUR problems get smacked real fucking fast after they are found.

      • coolguy98@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree that Flatpak’s utilization of sandboxing is weaker in practice than is marketed. I get that many apps ship with home/host filesystem access instead of granular permissions, but it does provide meaningful isolation when used correctly.

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The one positive with flatpak is that it allows for universal deployment. A lot of projects are providing official builds. But you are still relying on them to vet what they put in.