• w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    Even if I wanted AI in my AirPods, how is this gonna work for people with long hair? This makes no sense.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Oh, brilliant! This is exactly what I wanted and directly solves so many problems and frustrations I have with the status quo! Thank goodness for such innovation! I feel seen!

    Edit: oops, that should say “I hope everyone involved in bringing this product to market gets given an STI by a hippopotamus”. Silly autocorrect.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 hours ago

    …users can query Siri about, like asking the AI assistant what they should cook with the ingredients they have in front of them … may also use the cameras to help with things like turn-by-turn directions.

    Those are some pretty underwhelming use-cases. I can’t see the world beating a path to anyone’s door for that. Even if you were so excited about these features that you were willing to overlook the privacy concerns, it seems like the phone you’ve already got would probably be just fine as a conduit for such services.

    • Airfried@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And if we’re not ignoring the privacy concerns these use cases are definitely not worth putting everyone in front of you under this form of surveillance for a US tech giant and ultimately the US government. The price for society to pay is way too high.

      • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Done. I held up my GPS-enabled smart phone I paid $50 for 10 years ago to my eye line, better yet I was able to get a real-time preview of the angle of the picture to ensure everything’s in shot.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah. But mind that the bulk price of mediocre cameras is insignificant next to the sales price of AirPods.

      I think the idea is that people can walk around and chat with their AI companion, and it sees what they see. No need for any fussing about with hardware. That’s exactly Apple’s thing. Effortless technology for people who don’t want to deal with the mechanics of technology.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If your phone is too much of a pain to get out of your pocket, surely a watch or bracelet is a better form factor for this.

  • xSikes@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Hard pass and also don’t have $400 for shit that’s not going to hold a battery charge for long.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    The AirPods’ cameras “aren’t designed” to snap photos or video but instead can take in “visual information in low resolution” that users can query Siri about, like asking the AI assistant what they should cook with the ingredients they have in front of them, according to Gurman. They may also use the cameras to help with things like turn-by-turn directions.

    So you got to hover that leek next to your ears? Nice they are low resolution but if they can recognise something sitting on a kitchen counter in front of you then that is not a relevant argument. They can 100% be used to identify people standing in front of you as well and that is going to be outside anyones control.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This AI push is stagnating innovation.

      I think it’s the other way around, corporate consolidation (including capturing our governments and getting all research funding) killed innovation a while ago and now AI is just the latest non-idea that is being used to cover up that none of the corporations have any new ideas. Even Apple’s latest good idea, ARM laptops, was basically done by cheap Linux nettops a decade ago.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Also, ARM laptops were Steve Jobs’ last big idea. He put in place Apple’s last 10 year plan before he died. The first M series laptop came out nine years after his death.

        The reason being that Apple is actually considered to be one of the founding members of ARM so they have unique access to the core. Moving to ARM was always the plan after moving to Intel. Apple was the first company to produce a portable ARM device, the Newton back in the early 90s before Jobs’ return.

        So even that innovation isn’t exactly new.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    People would enjoy these features. But they want it to happen without a camera, somehow.

    So they are supposedly verboten features. Never to be done.