• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The USA has a very strong first amendment. Cruise social media and you can find Americans literally calling on fellow Americans to overthrow the government. And these people are largely left alone by the government. Heck, a fair number of folks who were involved in the January 6th insurrection are still walking free.

    Contrast to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_dissidents#Detained_and_jailed_people

    But yes. The US is absolutely not perfect.

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      https://www.npr.org/2024/03/13/1237501725/house-vote-tiktok-ban

      Advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, have called the bill “censorship plain and simple,” arguing that “jeopardizing access to the platform jeopardizes access to free expression.”

      At 27 years old, Florida Democratic Rep. Maxwell Frost is the youngest member of Congress, and he opposes the bill.

      “I think that it is a violation of people’s First Amendment rights,” he said. “TikTok is a place for people to express ideas. I have many small businesses in my district and content creators in my district, and I think it’s going to drastically impact them too.”

      The fact that Republicans started it is enough for me to be at least suspicious of why its even being considered.

      EDIT: Also lol at “strong first amendment rights” when redneck states ban any books with queer or black characters. And lmao at “Strong first amendment rights” when people get fired for talking about forming a union, let alone even trying to make one.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The fundamental difference is who is in control, and for what purpose.

    American spyware is controlled by corporations, and is all about selling you shit you don’t need.

    Chinese (and Russian) spyware is–apparently–controlled rather directly by their respective governments, and is being used to suppress democracy and increase polarization in the US and EU.

    I don’t like any spyware. But the latter category–spyware that’s functionally state-sponsored–is clearly more immediately dangerous. The former is more like a slow-growing cancer.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Tankies trying so hard to have any spyware be acceptable. Sorry (not sorry), but tiktok is just as evil as Google.

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I read through the first link you provided, it doesn’t align with your claim “TikTok OBJECTIVELY collects far lesser data than Big Tech apps and services.”

        We go section by section


        The companies collecting your face, voice & environment

        TikTok is worst here, collection all possible voice, face, environment data


        What can companies tell from image recognition?

        Again TikTok infer as much information as possible, worst among all listed.


        The later couple section did not mention tiktok, so I cannot compare it.

        Finally

        the 5 social media apps that know most about you

        TikTok ranked number 3 in among all the social media, above clubhouse and twitter, just below facebook and instagram.

      • Trarmp@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        TikTok OBJECTIVELY collects far lesser data than Big Tech apps and services

        This is not true for a number of reasons, first being that once the data gets sent to a Chinese server, it’s gone. It’s like a void. Those “data collections analysis” can speculate, but they truly have no idea what happens with that data. Another reason that TikTok is as bad as Instagram, is that they farmed all the data from the in-app browser. Every click, scroll, everything.

        You can argue that they have a different approach to data farming, and they do: they try and rope you in, trick you into giving them your data. But it’s demonstrable wrong to say that they collect less data. I wouldn’t say they collect more data than typical west social media platforms, but I think it’s disingenuous to say they’re somehow better.

  • peepee_longstonking@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The concern about TikTok acquiring your private information for marketing purposes is a red herring. The concern of our government here is propaganda and narrative control – power.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    They are not the same thing. Facebook is bad too (and actually, a platform-neutral legal restriction based on behavior would be better), but TikTok is absolutely unique in the type of threat it poses:

    1. The Chinese government treats communication networks as their personal hoovering-attachment for any data they might want. Companies are required by law to operate as an arm of Chinese intelligence, both in terms of giving information and in terms of manipulating what information people on their network are allowed to see. The FBI and NSA definitely spy on Americans too to some extent, but it’s simply not in the same league or with the same type of goals.
    2. It’s not just your TikTok data. It’s photos and files on your phone, your contacts, your messages, basically anything that the app with its too-permissive permissions can get its hands on, can potentially go up to Chinese intelligence.
    3. TikTok is not structured like any other app. It has features like custom-downloading and running arbitrary binaries from its central server that honestly don’t even make much sense except as spying apparatus (consistent with #1).
    4. What China might do with this unprecedented level of access to everyone’s phones is malevolent in a different way than, say, Facebook’s access to everyone’s data. Like Facebook they have the ability to e.g. influence an election, but they also have the ability to try to blackmail an individual to compromise them, or do for-real torture in the real world (say by tracking down a dissident via TikTok spying and then having one of their little Chinese-police-in-America units grab them).

    Citations:

    1. https://thehill.com/opinion/cybersecurity/532583-for-chinese-firms-theft-of-your-data-is-now-a-legal-requirement/
    2. https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-protection/understanding-information-tiktok-gathers-and-stores
    3. https://www.currentware.com/blog/block-tiktok/
    4. https://www.businessinsider.com/china-hong-kong-spy-agency-official-presence-national-security-laws-report-2020-6 https://www.npr.org/2023/04/17/1170571626/fbi-arrests-2-on-charges-tied-to-chinese-outpost-in-new-york-city
  • tiredcapillary@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not big of a fan of Chinese surveillance but to most peoples point that have already posted here, if this was about privacy then the government should be passing laws to protect consumer privacy as a whole and not just targeting Chinese companies. Really shows that the government doesn’t give a shit about your privacy just who’s able to get it.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If I had a nickel for every time I saw one of these posts, I’d have two nickels, Which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice on the same day

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    My main reason is I’m an American, China (probably) can’t do shit to me. But here I’m subject to so much shit America can do legally and illegally, with zero repercussions.

    If China fucked me in particular over, odds are it would at least spark debate here. If America spied on my messages and stopped me from protesting something, that’s just a Tuesday afternoon here.

    The only reason why Congress wants to ban it, is due to pressure from news agencies and the government, because TikTok can’t be controlled by the CIA. You can’t manufacture consent of the people if the content comes from someone else you don’t control.

    https://www.npr.org/2024/03/13/1237501725/house-vote-tiktok-ban

    • jackpot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      no, tiktok is controlled by an adversial power that intentionally manipulates what you see to shape your opinions. theyve already blatantly lied to all of their users by a forced pop-up of what the bill against them contains. you can protest in america, you cant in china. if you think so, please go and say xi jinping is a stupid loser in beijing and see how long til you get arreated

  • Pietson@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m European and I definitely feel that way. I don’t like American spyware, but I trust the Chinese government much less than I do American corporations.

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Tankies failing to comprehend the fundamental difference between an actor who tries to make money off you and an actor trying to manufacture dissent and influence the public narrative

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Point taken, though it’s still an American company they could crack down upon if they prove too dangerous too.

        To be clear: I don’t want to get spied upon by anyone and I don’t use most of the American services for that reason. But obviously domestic bad actors are better than bad actors controlled by a foreign and hostile government

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It would be a lot better if Congress could pass a comprehensive privacy bill, but we lack a functioning government so I guess this is the best we can do.

          Greatest democracy in the world, right here.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            … it’s obvious because a domestic entity is subject to local laws, and can if push comes to shove be shut down or nationalized. A foreign one is essentially out of reach.

            • saga@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The existence of the article you’re literally commenting on directly refutes what you’re saying here. Like you’re in a thread because of news that demonstrates that the opposite of what you’re saying here is actually true.

              If you need more examples - What happened to Facebook after the Cambridge Analytica scandal? They got banned by congress right? They got shut down? The government stopped them from continuing to manipulate the public?

              • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Why is it contentious that a government can better curb foreign interference if it is done on a domestic platform? Regardless of how shitty the United States are that’s a simple fact and also practiced by China, only to a much greater extent.

        • trebuchet@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s crazy to me that people such as you unironically believe the position you’re saying that American companies are easier to crack down on.

          We are literally seeing concrete proof in action that domestic companies are much harder to crack down on or regulate. They are much better positioned to lobby and are currently using their immense political power to protect themselves while removing their foreign rivals. There isn’t even talk of taking action against them because they are so politically powerful.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Read the other comments, I don’t want to repeat myself for every idiot jumping on the dogpile. Why does every single China fan assume I love the United States and have a blind eye towards their bullshit? I’m not an American.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      trying to manufacture dissent and influence the public narrative

      That shit is all over American social media too buddy. If that’s the issue it should all be banned.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      2013: Microsoft handed the NSA access to encrypted messages

      Microsoft has collaborated closely with US intelligence services to allow users’ communications to be intercepted, including helping the National Security Agency to circumvent the company’s own encryption, according to top-secret documents obtained by the Guardian.

      The files provided by Edward Snowden illustrate the scale of co-operation between Silicon Valley and the intelligence agencies over the last three years. They also shed new light on the workings of the top-secret Prism program, which was disclosed by the Guardian and the Washington Post last month.