If these people were at all reasonable or giving a shit about anybody else, they wouldn’t be ayncaps.
Next stop: extermination.
There is an average of 45.9 empty homes in the U.S. for each person experiencing homelessness.
It’s an investment by the megacorps (with gov monies) into keeping the plebs in check, to not get any ideas around equity or social reform.
Not only that. The housing is then maintained by taxpayers, who are not the rich strata. So it’s another way to funnel money from the poor/middle class to the corporation owned by the rich.
We? How about “we” remove the rich, so that homelessness is only a frie and true choice if you want to be traveling?
The only people who’d like there to be homeless people are the rich and powerful.
Well, there WAS that thing a couple of months ago where Kilmeade said the quiet part out loud, suggesting we should execute them.
Homeless people should NOT exist in a world with trillionaires. Fuck the rich so hard.
Totally agree. What the fuck is a society that just cares about money and not people. Its not worth surviving.
The sad thing is that it has been like this for so damn long it isn’t funny. And the people who like it this way will never go away.
Phrase that differently or the wealthy will get the wrong idea.
nah, I’m not a minor
I think this might have been about the “should not exist” party which could also mean “kill them all”, in the billionaire’s mind.
That wasn’t what I…
You know what, that works too.
Here’s a reminder that there are nearly 14,000,000 vacant houses in America, and less than 650,000 homeless people. The math comes out to ~22 vacant houses for every single homeless person. I’ll give you one guess which income bracket owns the vast majority of those vacant houses…
I’ll give you one guess which income bracket owns the vast majority of those vacant houses…
it’s poor people, right? right?
Well duh, they’re on the street because they’re experiencing decision paralysis on what house to live in that day.
Alright, so let’s kill 'em!
(Ambiguity is on purpose.)
They know goddamn well a big contingent is willing to if they had the opportunity, so they’ve gone to great lengths to avoid such possibilities.
This should intrigue people who like a challenge idk
It’s “expensive” in the “right” way. The costs are paid by taxes, which are largely supplied by the 99%. The revenue, by contrast, is privatized, going to corporations owned by the 1%.
So it’s only “expensive” for the masses, which lawmakers don’t care about.
Just another way to extract surplus created by the 99%.
Not to mention the slave labor they gain out of it.
I was lumping that into “revenue”
👆 👆 These two guys/girls/dudes/men/women get it.
It isn’t even really about the privatization. They just want the ability to game the investment scam system.
I’m unfamiliar with this bal—Is it a country or an ism?
An ‘-ism’. Specifically anarcho-capitalism.
I regret asking, but thank you for the clarification
It’s not that expensive if you use them as slave labor and ignore their human rights… Well, still expensive for the tax payers, but who cares for those peasants? /s
How about organs? I’m about done with this liver and I could use a bigger penis.
Move them into “Sanctuary Districts”.
Truth. The cheapest option is housing and mental health care.
How about house them in a way that take away their voting rights and use them as cheap labor? Member how prisoners were used to fight the Palisades fires in January?
deleted by creator
How about house them in a way that take away their voting rights and use them as cheap labor? Member how prisoners were used to fight the Palisades fires in January?
Don’t forget the expensive housing is provided by a for-profit prison system. It’s expensive for taxpayers, but someone else is getting rich.
