• King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

            • King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

          • qfjp@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s desktop extensions. Most mobile browsers only support a subset of all available extensions (including Firefox!). Now, Firefox will support its whole library of extensions.

            • King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              They only mention “open extension ecosystem” idk if that means everything and also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

              • qfjp@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                They only mention “open extension ecosystem”

                • The title: “Prepare your Firefox desktop extension for the upcoming Android release”
                • End of the first paragraph: “Here’s everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO…”
                • End of the second paragraph: “so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?”

                also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

                And those were installed from the mozilla addon library? With full support for a mobile interface? And you tried every extension available?

                I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games

                Flash used to be a mobile extension…

                • King@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says “about upcoming android release” desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

                  And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

      • randint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Firefox has always had been the most attractive to many people.

  • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Mobile FF is already awesome with UBlock Origin and YT background playback extensions. I wish to install an auto redirect extension. (Twitter to Nitter) I know it is doable on beta w/ extensions etc. but I want to see them on normal Firefox.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s nice, maybe they can finally re-enable about:config in the damn thing too. They removed it from mobile Firefox years ago and the lack of it aggravates the hell out of me.

  • Siliconic@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    About time. I’m tempted to switch back to Mull from Bromite, but I’m worried about the security of Firefox compared to Chromium (that’s why I switched in the first place), I’ve heard that particularly Mobile Firefox has awful sandboxing and bad security, I’m pretty sure it was the GrapheneOS team saying this? I’m no security expert though…

    • randint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yes it was the GrapheneOS team who said that. See the paragraph just above Camera. I literally just skimmed their guides and saw this yesterday while considering getting a Pixel.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I use Mull and Vanadium on Graphene OS, and the experience on Vanadium is just okay by comparison. It is true that not having extensions does decrease the attack surface, and Vanadium does have a built in ad blocker, but it simply isn’t as all encompassing as ublock’s list.

        I use Mull mainly but don’t log into anything with it, and have noscript extension on by default.

        I also turn off JS by default in Vanadium. Both browsers have ways of making exceptions for certain sites in this case, but NoScript has more granular control.

        I remember reading on reddit a convo that basically the GrapheneOS team was much more concerned with security than privacy. This isn’t to say they don’t care about privacy at all, just that they will always prioritize security first.

        This makes sense considering their decision to only officially support the Pixel line of devices. You still are supporting Google by giving them your money (and a bit of your data in the process of purchase). Additionally, the decision to default to using the Google Play Store and sandbox the apps, rather than use the Aurora Store, also points to these underlying values.

        • JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Posted this above, but it might interest you as an alternative to Vanadium:

          Bromite hasn’t been updated in a while, so you should at least switch to Cromite if you’re not switching to Mull. It’s a fork by a previous Bromite contributor and includes some improvements, like a bottom toolbar and adblock plus (so normal block lists, not Bromite’s less customizable ad blocker.

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Is Vanadium just Bromite under the hood? I thought they were separate projects…

            • JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              They’re different, but according to its readme, Cromite includes “security enhancement patches from GrapheneOS project”, so I assume it contains Vanadium’s changes as well as other improvements.