• Aaron@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean that would make sense if Antifa had anything to do with fascism. It’s just one of many movements wearing labels that intentionally misrepresent it’s members.

    It’s like being anti-Patriot act and then others claiming that you’re against patriotism.

    You’re playing into their hands.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Love this argument.

      You wouldn’t know a fascist if it grabbed you by the pussy.

      And that’s like saying “If Black Lives Matter were actually black” or something. Antifa isn’t a group, person, or organization…it’s an idea. Much like BLM or Occupy.

      The real problem is that the idea ends up losing focus as it gains support, and then it gets spread out too far, and then it dies. Happens nearly every time.

      • Aaron@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Love this argument.

        Me too!

        You wouldn’t know a fascist if it grabbed you by the pussy.

        You’re correct. I wouldn’t. Because I don’t have one.

        Antifa isn’t a group, person, or organization…it’s an idea.

        Tell that to it’s supporters.

        Much like BLM or Occupy.

        Wrong again.

        The real problem is that the idea ends up losing focus as it gains support, and then it gets spread out too far, and then it dies. Happens nearly every time.

        Well unfortunately this one persists.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Antifascism is an idea. There are groups centered around said idea, but “big antifa” isn’t a thing.

          Being anti-antifascism is pro-fascism.

        • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          BLM and Occipy aren’t organizations. There is a BLM organization. But that’s like if I created an organization called Feminism. That wouldn’t make Feminism an organization. That just means there’s an organization based on the movement.

          Feel free to take a seat.

      • Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.orgBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think you are mistaking infiltration for ‘getting spread out too far’.

        Nearly all of what you describe can be most easily attributed to planted agitators.

  • Crass Spektakel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The difference between the extreme wings is miniscule. Methods, Objectives and Goals are the same, just the arguments differ slightly.

    In Germany half of the voters of the Ultra-Left Party “Linkspartei” went within one election to the Ultra-Right Party “Alternative für Deutschland”. Even starnger, the AfD is financed by Putin who wants to recreate Stalinism, which is Ultra-Leftist, while the AfD wants to recreate a Führer-Cult which is Ultra-Right. And still both cooperate perfectly.

    People need to understand that the Extremists on the wings are closer to each other than to the middle. While the middle tries to better things in small steps the Extremists want to burn the house down with everyone inside and then see who survives.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sorry, but this is just horseshoe-theory Enlightened Centrist nonsense.

      Methods? No. The far-right relies on terror, fear, and explicit power structures such as a police state to maintain power. Leftists oppose such structures, even on the ultra-left.

      Objectives? Absolutely not. Right-wingers seek to maintain Capitalism, the far-right seeks to implement fascism as a reactionary protection of Capitalist hierarchy, complete with racial and gender hierarchy. The extreme left, ie Anarchists and Communists, seek a Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society based on horizontal power structures. Completely different.

      Goals? Same as objectives.

      Horseshoe theory is absolute nonsense, and is used to protect the status quo even if the status quo must be radically changed.

      • Crass Spektakel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Stalin and Pol Pot and Saddam used mostly the same methods as Hitler and as Pinochet and just like the Taliban.

        They wanted total power to reform the society to their day dreams. There is not much difference if you call your Economy Plan “Five Year Plan” or “Maximale Kriegswirtschaft”. In the end everyone gets under the foot of the Big Brother, the Grosser Führer, вождь woschd (Yes, Stalin let himself call Führer as did several other Extremist leaders).

        We need to learn that the Extremists are much further away from the middle than the parties of the middle to each other. But also the Extremists are much closer to themselves.

        Even Trump and Putin show a lot of those methods and while Trump dreams of US Fascism and Putin dreams of Reviving Stalinism their Objectives are just the same: Total power for themselfes.

        Oh, I hear you already screaming “But they weren’t Socialists/Fascists” - well, they were part of the Socialist International, they called themselves Socialists and people travelled there to see Socialism. “If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.”

        The Way less extreme people defend themselves from the more extreme people is just “But they weren’t true right/left wing. They were something else!” - Boy, I am so tired of it. If 99% if your ventures into Extremism always end the same then I see a pattern that the results will ALWAYS be the same.

        And seeing how easily East Germans nowadays change from Ultra-Left to Ultra-Right and visa versa I say: Proof by Observation in the Wild.

        I am not even talking about the US where 90% of the people simply don’t even understand what left, right, middle, liberal and Extremism means. When giving a kid free health care is socialism and people think free voting is disrespectable liberalism.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          This is even more bullshit, lmao. The only leftist you listed was Stalin, every single one of the others is a far-right fascist that oversaw a Capitalist economy. That includes Putin, who is reactionary. Even then, many call Stalin red-fash, and they aren’t entirely wrong either.

          Additionally, if you think reactionary changes after states fall is because the far left and far right are similar, then again, you don’t understand historical trends or movements. These are reactionary movements to a large-scale failure.

          Again, this is nothing but horse-shoe theory nonsense, it’s equivalent to astrology in validity but far more dangerous politically.

          Here’s a quick example: which is better, an extreme antiracist, or an extreme racist? In your eyes, both are equally bad. Radicalism is not bad alone, neither is extremism. Each view must be judged on a case by case basis.

          • Crass Spektakel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Whenever a Left-Extremist does something stupid his buddies just claim “Well, he wasn’t Left anyway. Lets just pretend he was a Nazi instead, haha.”

            Brilliant. But easy to see through.

            The Right-Extremist takes peoples property and life because they are the wrong race. The Left-Extremists takes peples property without reason and life because we wasn’t left enough.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  The bit about the left taking peoples property for no reason and fighting people for not being left of them screams “strawman with no actual points against leftism” to me. You’ve got this whole “Enlightened Centrist” thing going on that just proves you don’t actually want to analyze things and instead just fence-sit because the status quo benefits you.

  • Pavidus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Someone mentioned antifa at work the other day, and I said, “Antifa? I’m in. Shitting on fascists has been an American pass time for a century or better.”

    The looks of shock and horror on my coworkers faces was quite the sight to behold.

    • Crass Spektakel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, I can tell you, in Europe Extremist Voters switch without thinking twice between far left and far right.

      Methods, Objectives and Goals are the same, just the arguments differ slightly.

      Both hate the West, especially the US and Israel, both hate the way we live but without offering a better way. Both want to burn down the house just to see who survives. Only the Arguments differ, the left hate the people running their own society, the right hate the people running other society.

      And always remember, Hitler was a National-SOCIALIST.

      • ElmarsonTheThird@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The “Socialist” in the NSDAP is only a honeypot so they could claim ground and voters who leaned socialist without much thought (“I’m a mill worker like my father before me, we have always voted socialist. Buuut that National-Thing sounds nice”). Same with the “A” which stands for “Arbeiter” (Workers).

        There’s the same with the conservative party (CDU = Christdemokratische Union, Christ-Democratic Union) today. Lots of old people say “I’m a christian and that party has a C for ‘Christianity’ in its name.” In fact, their regional party in Bavaria, the CSU is more conservative. And you have three guesses what their “S” is for.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Isn’t this the asian guy who doesn’t understand that white supremacists only like white people and claimed to be suing the CEO of Antifa for damages that never actually happened?

    • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m guessing that means this is also the dude who claimed people threw cement at him, when it was a milk shake.

      Then they claimed the milkshake had cement in it, so people pointed out things like sugar would keep cement from hardening.

      Then the cops said they had no reason to assume it was concrete, and no one suggested it was, despite them and the guy being the ones who said it was concrete.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Eyup, that’s the guy. It was also around the time others on the right claimed that people were pouring gasoline into bags in order to make “Makeshift Molotv Cocktails”

        When

        1. the whole point of a Molotov Cocktail is that it’s a makeshift weapon that the proletariat will always have access to as it’s just alcohol and fire

        B) A plastic bag wouldn’t make for a good molotov cocktail as it would just fucking disintegrate and couldn’t be thrown that far of a distance, if any at all

        • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Also, the cloth hanging over on to the side of the bag could melt the plastic, and then catch fire

          Or it might just not break and spread

          I get the point of misinformation isn’t that it needs to make sense, but some times I hear this stuff and wonder fucking why? At least try.

  • Disinfect056@lemm.eeBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Antifa is facist.

    Atifa opinion: my opinion is right no matter what Facist opinion: my opinion is right no matter what

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Antifa is antifascist.

      Antifa opinion: fascism is bad and must be opposed at every opportunity.

      Fascist opinion: extreme Nationalism, the state and the populace must be as one living organism, the enemy must be powerful enough to unite against and weak enough to feel superior, extreme statist Capitalism must take place, all rights and freedoms must be curbed in the name of an almighty state, and the state is absolute.

      These do not match up in any way.

    • StThicket@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you are against people who are against fascists, wouldn’t that indirectly say you don’t care about fascism? And that’s how fascism gets a foothold. And with that logic, you indirectly support fascism.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It was so frustrating watching some people treat him like he was anything close to a real journalist. He’s just the designated propagandist.

  • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anti-antifa only means you’re against the people claiming to be anti-fascist. It doesn’t mean you like fascism. Nor does being antifa mean everything you’re against is fascism.

    • pifox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it should be noted, the difference between antifa the organization and antifa the philosophy.

      I am very much ideologically anti-fascist and I believe I would take up arms against a fascist government, however antifa the org has made some questionable calls in the past.

      • odium@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        There is no overarching antifa organization though. Try looking for a website/forum/etc of antifa. There are websites for random local activist groups which call themselves <city name> antifa, but there is no leader or comittee overseeing these groups. There is no process to join antifa, any activist group or individual can call themselves antifa.

        So there are no calls made by antifa, good or bad. There are only calls made by individuals or local groups that call themselves antifa.

        • pifox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Fair. I think you can understand them as a group still, similarly to how you can see anonymous as a group.

          I don’t think I’m educated enough to say anything against the group as a whole, as I haven’t sat down to do a lot of research on them (I’m realizing now that my comment was made from a BS bias that I had picked up from when I was a conservative).

          however I don’t think the logic of the source meme on it’s own shows someone as fascist just because they oppose the antifa orginization.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            (I’m realizing now that my comment was made from a BS bias that I had picked up from when I was a conservative).

            Damn that’s refreshing to read.

          • odium@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I do agree that someone isn’t a fascist if they disagree with antifa. I was just talking about the part where you talked about antifa the organization.

          • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t think I’m educated enough to say anything against the group as a whole, as I haven’t sat down to do a lot of research on them (I’m realizing now that my comment was made from a BS bias that I had picked up from when I was a conservative).

            You should do more research :)

            Unless you’re talking about this one, referring to “the antifa organization” makes as little sense as saying “the conservative organization”. There are many organizations with variously overlapping goals and strategies for achieving them, but there hasn’t been a singular “antifa organization” since 1933.

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’re not pro-fascist, you’re just against people trying to stop the fascists. Thank god for nuance.

      • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        i hate fascists with a passion, but i might not agree with how antifa acts. i do not have any experience with the group itself, i might even agree with them.

        for example, i do not like how the last generation glued themselves to streets. that doesn’t make me a climate denier, does it?

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Might not agree with how antifa acts

          I have no experience

          ^^^ this pattern shows up right before you make a poorly thought out comment. If you don’t have experience with something I’d expect your comment to be a question for someone who has.

          • S410@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            How does burning a car improve anything? By what logic does not burning a car equal to “fucking over the next 15 generations”?
            Misdirected rage, even if it’s initially for a good reason, doesn’t help anything. If there’s a house on fire, you pour water on that house, not one two streets over. You do the latter, you end up with two destroyed houses: one burned, the other flooded.

        • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          but violent protests don’t contribute

          There is no alternative to fighting fascists with violence. You can’t have a nice talk with someone who is gunning down Jewish persons. You just shoot them in the face.

          Someone supports fascists who want to genocide a group of people? Burning down their car is less than they deserve.

          I invite you to learn more about the holocaust. The suffering cannot be put into words. There is no means too drastic to prevent something like it to ever happen again.

          • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            let me rephrase. violence not directed at fascists doesn’t contribute.

            i was referring to innocent people’s property being destroyed.

            if someone arsons a nazi, that’s perfectly reasonable to me.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          There is no singular group called “antifa”. It’s a movement of loosely (at best) interconnected but independent, antifascist groups.
          Also, we need all these groups. It’s them who usually organize rallies against racism, fascism, antisemitism, inhuman law proposals, et cetera. Also they organize all sorts of other actions against alt right, far right and (neo-)nazis, like disrupting their rallies and standing in the way of goon squads.
          Antifa groups are damn important.

        • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not pro Hitler, but did they really have to bully the poor man to suicide?

          • @KptnAutismus, probably
        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m baffled as to what the point of this comment is, besides waffling about the virtues of not picking sides for not picking sides’ sake.

          • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            i have picked the side that’s stopping fascists. but the enemy of my enemy isn’t automatically my friend. i do not respect movents who are known for committing arson and battery regularly.

            • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I see your edit above, i see the comments you posted after said edit, and I’m not sure you now actually got what antifa means. Especially the part about it not being a single, coherent organization doesn’t seem to get to you.

              • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                it did. but these smaller, unorganized groups are regularly holding violent protests around my area. and they identify with antifa.

                i probably identify with the core values of what it means to be antifascist, but again, i don’t want to be seen as extremist and/or violent.

        • Its not “the group”.If you look in left and right wing violence in most countries you’ll see a huge disparity, even after the right wing police has significantly biased the statistics. Most people in Antifa groups just go to demos, organize workshops and put political stickers up.

          Thats alle the stuff Fox wants to villify, because they want people to be fascists.