Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoTarget Acquiredsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageTarget Acquiredsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squarewinterayars@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months ago“People don’t want to pay what you’re charging so you should drop the price” AA: “No” Repost to scare an economics 101 class.
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoWould this technically be anti-capitalistic? They’re refusing to charge what the market will bear.
minus-squarePyr_Pressure@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoThey could simply be chasing the largest profit. If you have 40 first class seats instead of 60 regular seats, why would you drop the price of the first class if you could make more with the 60 regular seats.
“People don’t want to pay what you’re charging so you should drop the price”
AA: “No”
Repost to scare an economics 101 class.
AA: “No” cocks gun
Would this technically be anti-capitalistic? They’re refusing to charge what the market will bear.
They could simply be chasing the largest profit.
If you have 40 first class seats instead of 60 regular seats, why would you drop the price of the first class if you could make more with the 60 regular seats.