![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Bold of you to assume it’ll get better
Bold of you to assume it’ll get better
Nah, those guys are above the law. It’s not like anything happened the hundreds of other times the government has been caught violating the constitution or acting illegally.
Yeah, things will have to get worse, but when there’s no peaceful means of fixing the problem…
I’m not advocating for violence, I can just recognize that they’re guaranteeing it. A much better resolution would be to amend the constitution to allow votes of no confidence, but that’ll never happen.
Unfortunately it’ll likely get thrown out since the SC ruled that the police don’t have any obligation to protect people.
As a Texan, this is very surprising. Great job, Grand Jury.
There’s a quota, so unless you have a few hundred million dollars laying around, it’s a futile fight.
And it actually cleans between your teeth
Every day it becomes more of a prophecy.
A hate crime is when the crime intentionally targets a specific demographic.
Look into the servarr suite. I just add what I want and it finds and downloads it for me.
Their complaint is that he isn’t sharing it.
Parents are responsible for the actions of their children. She’s the reason he owned the gun.
Not having legal precedence is hardly a reason to dissent, Thomas.
I’m pretty sure the 13th amendment had about the same level of legal precedence too.
It’s in the US, and it’s been a minute, but things have always been bad regarding customers. You just gotta know how to handle the bad ones.
Now that one is true
The first paragraph of your link says ‘plans to ban’. The title says he has banned it.
The title says he banned it, but the article says he’s planning on banning it.
Congress sells weapons, not the president. Congress can even prevent a veto if the sale is large enough.
Yeah, in the US they’d probably charge you $500, minimum.