• RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    From what I can see, arm Linux itself is still a very small market so I don’t see how a small company could work on it and make a profit from that. Maybe once it becomes more mainstream and there is a bigger demand for it, they would definitely consider it. I would rather have them focus on what they have and expand their production, cost and sales region at the moment.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      arm Linux itself is still a very small market

      • Android
      • Raspberry Pi and similar SBCs
      • data centers (someone linked AWS graviton)
      • Chromebooks

      The list goes on. Linux is well established on ARM, and outside proprietary software, pretty much everything works on it. Desktop linux has been ready on ARM for over a decade, and people would buy it if it existed in a decent laptop.

      If Framework can source decently fast ARM chips and board for a decent cost, people will buy then, myself included. If they include a trackpoint and physical mouse buttons (esp middle mouse button), I’d replace my Thinkpad today even if it’s still on x86.

      There’s demand for it today, it’s just probably in the thousands instead of millions.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      If ARM is a small market, RISC-V is even smaller.

      I personally like when boundaries are pushed, and welcome more independence on x86.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, but there’s no license fees for RISC-V, so they need to sell less volume to be profitable.