• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 1st, 2023
  • neeeeDanke@feddit.de
    toTechnology@lemmy.world•EU chat control law proposes scanning your messages — even encrypted onesEnglish
    19·
    11 days ago

    This one was not passed yet.

    The vote was pulled in the last minute, because they didn’t expect to get the required qualified majority. This was among other things due to the German governmant announcing to vote against it.

    Germany is about to have an election next year though and the conservative and faschist parties are expected to win, I doubt they would be holding this position. France is also having an election soon with the faschists expected to win big. And their current government is responsible for this law not beeing even worse.

    TLDR: It didn’t pass yet, but this will not be the last attempt at passing it.

  • neeeeDanke@feddit.de
    toProgrammer Humor@lemmy.ml•Find yourself
    1·
    8 months ago

    to be fair it does seem to work for any two numbers where one is >1. As lim x,y–> inf ln(ex+ey) <= lim x,y --> inf ln(2 e^(max(x,y))) = max(x,y) + ln(2).

    I think is cool because works for any number of variables

    using the same proof as before we can see that: lim,x_i -->inf ln(sum_i/in I} e^(x_i)) <= ln(I|) +max{x_i | i /in I.

    So it would only work for at most [base of your log, so e<3 for ln] variables.