This statement always reminds me of the movie Idiocracy.
This statement always reminds me of the movie Idiocracy.
He has not seen his son since the day he was arrested, and he is not sure if he will. “I don’t know what he thinks,” Mr. Grimm said.
Man, that last sentence is so sad for all involved.
" a poster-sized display of the Ten Commandments in “large, easily readable font” in all public classrooms, from kindergarten to state-funded universities. "
I use syncthing, which works great unless you need a ton of space.
If I copy McDonald’s site one by one for my own restaurant and just change the name, you can expect to be sued.
And yet, their site is available publicly?
Could send it over ATP - Avian Transfer Protocol.
Does require a USB stick and for your friend to train a pigeon though.
Not necessarily true
How does that “garbage” affect update time?
I still don’t see how that makes Firefox difficult.
The transition might be difficult, but I rarely see casual people use the options you describe.
It’s as easy as opening the shortcut and start browsing, I see no difference with Chrome there
Why would Firefox be difficult to use?
Pretty much everyone here agrees that it’s a shitty concept. Doesn’t solve anything and it’s a privacy nightmare.
No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.
Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.
Qwant uses their own index, but supplements it with Bing if they don’t have enough info (or for images).
It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.
All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
I think you are a bit confused about the E-mail structure.
Everything behind the @ is the domain, on your case “domain.com” Before the @ is just a name that can be used as you, the domain owner, wants.
If you want to redirect all mail to yourname@domain.com, that’s very easy to do AND you can still see the original e-mail address these nails were sent to.
So I assume for example Dropbox sent some commercial mail about current offers. Using that, he knew the old account and that it was signed up to Dropbox
This is /s right?
It’s from an Apple commercial, which was an allusion to 1984
Victimless crime. Who says they’re not smuggling ammo into the country to use for criminal activity? You only need to fire a single bullet to kill someone.
It’s more than correct that they’re detained and go to trial. I don’t think anyone is actually sentenced yet?
I also assume 12 years is the upper limit for possession here.
Don’t most of these photographs use editing to at least touch them up a little? I don’t think many published photographs are actually the raw photos.
So trying to hack hackthebox is not permitted? Confusion is the name of the game