FediTown
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago

Chinese Sixth Generation Fighters Poised to Cut Pentagon Demand For F-35s: Lockheed Martin Stock Drops After New Jets’ Unveiling

militarywatchmagazine.com

external-link
message-square
104
link
fedilink
33
external-link

Chinese Sixth Generation Fighters Poised to Cut Pentagon Demand For F-35s: Lockheed Martin Stock Drops After New Jets’ Unveiling

militarywatchmagazine.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
104
link
fedilink
Stock of the United States’ largest defence contractor Lockheed Martin was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Deutsche Bank by 14.5 percent, with a price target of $523
  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lockheed model of sucking up taxes without producing anything only works when the US feels they have superiority over the adversaries. Now that it’s becoming clear this is not the case, there will be a push to actually have to produce things that work, and Lockheed isn’t good at doing that.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where in the world are you getting that Lockheed stuff doesn’t work? SR71? F104? U2? F117? F22?

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh man, I remember seeing this U2 in museum, it did a great job intercepting Soviet AD 😂 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_U-2_incident

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You think the U2 was an intercepter?

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Removed by mod

            • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you’re just saying that one was once shot down as to why the U2 as a whole was an ineffective program?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                The fact that they have never been put into mass production is a very clear indicator that it was an ineffective program.

                • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Neither was the SR-71. Both programs had a very limited mission, which is why neither was ever produced in quantity.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sure both were experimental, and the experiment with U2 was to make something fly so high that it couldn’t be intercepted. Turned out that the US underestimated the quality of the AD systems Soviets developed.

        • signalsayge@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And yet they have still been operational for 60 years after that… Funny that the U2 lasted longer than the Soviet Union.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            as a museum piece

            • signalsayge@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You should probably look up what the word “operational” means.

Technology@lemmy.ml

technology@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.ml

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 253 users / day
  • 655 users / week
  • 1.96K users / month
  • 6.45K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 40.7K subscribers
  • 3.45K Posts
  • 28.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org