Steam :: Steamworks Development :: AI Content on Steam
steamcommunity.com
Back in June, we shared that while our goal continues to be shipping as many games as possible on Steam, we needed some time to learn about the fast-moving and legally murky space of AI technology, especially given Steam's worldwide reach. Today, after spending the last few months learning more about this space and talking with game developers, we are making changes to how we handle games that use AI technology. This will enable us to release the vast majority of games that use it.

Key points:

  • new questions for devs submitting their games (about pre- and live-generated AI content, guardrails preventing generation of anything illegal)
  • disclaimers on game’s store page
  • new system for reporting illegal content straight from in-game overlay
  • I Cast Fist@programming.devEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    I have a very strong gut feeling that some 98% of all games mades “mostly with AI” will be shit, cheap shovelware.

  • Quokka@quokk.auEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    That’s a decent middle ground, let the minority with the issue with it be able to avoid it while letting devs use the latest tools.

  • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    Pretty cool. I almost had to start liking Epic Store for not having such a dumb stance. The disclaimer on games using generative content is weird, but it’s a solid step forward.

  • audaxdreik@pawb.socialEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    Disappointing, but somehow inevitable.

    "This will enable us to release the vast majority of games that use it. "

    So it sounds like the floodgates are opening and now it’ll be up to the users to sort out the flood of BS. None of this is truly surprising, while I’m not cynical enough to suggest their temporary stance was a quick way to score some easy points with the anti-AI crowd, we all kind of have to acknowledge that this technology is coming and Steam is too big to be left behind by it. It stands to reason.

    I also understand the reasoning for splitting pre/live-generated AI content, but it’s all going to go in the same dumpster for me regardless.

    I certainly think it’s possible to use pre-generated AI content in an ethical and reasonable way when you’re committed to having it reach a strong enough stylistic and artistic vision with editors and artists doing sufficient passes over it. The thing is, the people already developing in that way would continue to do so because of their own standards, they won’t be affected by this decision. The people wanting to use generative AI to pump out quick cash grabs are the ones that will latch onto it, I can’t think of any other base this really appeals to.