“We are raising funds to support a critical legal defense in the fight against unchecked corporate power and a system that continues to favor the few over everyone else. This case isn’t just about one individual—it’s about challenging a status quo that protects the interest of the powerful at the expense of justice and fairness,” read one of the fundraising pages that was quickly removed by GoFundMe.

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Eh, I’m talking about speech that isn’t the direct result of real harm being done. I think the distinction is pretty clear don’t you?

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          People can AI generate convincing CP images. Should those be allowed?

          I don’t see why not, if nobody is being harmed in its creation. Just because something is disturbing doesn’t mean it needs to be illegal.

          saying people should go kill a certain group.

          Saying it doesn’t harm anyone, it’s the people doing it who cause harm, that seems pretty clear cut to me.