• Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not all TLDs are, just the ccTLDs. The .io domain was never intended to be such a popular one, but tech bros were like “zomg io! That’s like input/output!! So techie!!!” Meanwhile, .tech exists and is not country-specific but is far less popular for some reason.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Meanwhile, .tech exists and is not country-specific but is far less popular for some reason.

      Simple answer: length.

      Two chars look a lot better than something with more chars, and all two chars TLD are ccTLDs.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Another reason is brand identity.

        Using ‘.tech’ or ‘.flights’ or .sports’ for your site feels too “on the nose” and gives vibes of like browsing some directory where things are categorised and sorted. Even worse it implies there are other sites under the same category, and those other sites may be competitors, and this dilutes strength of brand.

        lt also suggests strongly what the business does, and while that might seem desirable at first it actually isn’t from a corporate perspective because it means the company becomes tied to their business area and can’t expand and grow out of it into other things.

        I think this is a major part of why descriptive TLDs continue to be less preferred over ‘meaningless’ two letter TLDs, because companies want the focus to be on the main part of the domain, not the TLD.

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I know someone who has a company with the word “technology” in the name, like “Smith Technology”. They use .technology because it’s literally the name of the company, which I think is good for the brand identity, but have run into issues where people just don’t think it’s a correct url because “smith.technology” looks like it’s missing its TLD.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I generally don’t trust .io for that particular reason. It’s the Steve Jobs of the world picking that for buzz; the Steve Wozniaks of the world would simply choose .org.

      And…, to make sure my joke didn’t lead me to find it Woz had a fucking io website, I looked it up and his personal cite is fucking org. Lol

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Isn’t .org reserved for non-profit websites though? At least on the basis of internet etiquette? Some .io websites I know are completely monetized and about making money. And of course not everyone can afford a .com domain with a cool name right off the bat.