• moe90@feddit.nlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    11 days ago

    then you don’t need to come to Singapore. their country their rules

    • Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I really dislike this argument. Just because it’s “their country, their rules” doesn’t not make it an issue? Especially when it comes to privacy concerns. Privacy concerns are universal. There are a plethora of serious issues that are not defended by “national sovereignty”. If that was the case we should just turn a blind eye to North Korea, right?

      • slickgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Unfortunately this has always been the case with other country’s rules. I’m not a fan of US gun culture, but I’m not American, so I don’t get a vote.

        Nobody is forcing you to visit either Singapore or North Korea.

          • slickgoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            True. But if that happened to you involuntary data violations would be the least of your problems.

      • moe90@feddit.nlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 days ago

        I think this kind of biometric immigration verification will come to many countries eventually. Like UK, Japan and USA already tested this kind of procedure and Singapore is just one step ahead with this full implementation. So, we just can’t avoid it. If this kind of verification concerns you a lot just don’t travel abroad.

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          It is the standard means of passport control in Europe and UK, just with the passport added, but all by machine. Once they are convinced the biometrics are good enough they’ll do this too to speed things up.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      At the moment it sounds optional, so that’s a plus.

      Also:

      The previous average clearance time for each traveller was 25 seconds, said ICA.

      So, 15s saved per person. Which is handy, but 25 seconds fits squarely in the “blazing fast” category anyway.

      Bet the people will spend more than 15s per person dealing with the ramifications of their biometric data getting leaked and used against them later though.

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Agreed with the privacy concerns but

        So, 15s saved per person. Which is handy, but 25 seconds fits squarely in the “blazing fast” category anyway.

        This is huge when there are five 787s worth of people in line for ten passport control machines, it’s the difference between waiting half an hour in line or five minutes.

      • moe90@feddit.nlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I was there on transit hall couple of months ago and on the arrival hall everything is paperless already and all the paperwork can be done via phone or tablet. EDIT: as long as your device have a proper modern web browser. everything can be done easily.

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Paperless doesn’t necessarily require biometric data… still, I’ll just skip Singapore.