• Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I really dislike this argument. Just because it’s “their country, their rules” doesn’t not make it an issue? Especially when it comes to privacy concerns. Privacy concerns are universal. There are a plethora of serious issues that are not defended by “national sovereignty”. If that was the case we should just turn a blind eye to North Korea, right?

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Unfortunately this has always been the case with other country’s rules. I’m not a fan of US gun culture, but I’m not American, so I don’t get a vote.

      Nobody is forcing you to visit either Singapore or North Korea.

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          True. But if that happened to you involuntary data violations would be the least of your problems.

    • moe90@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      I think this kind of biometric immigration verification will come to many countries eventually. Like UK, Japan and USA already tested this kind of procedure and Singapore is just one step ahead with this full implementation. So, we just can’t avoid it. If this kind of verification concerns you a lot just don’t travel abroad.

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        It is the standard means of passport control in Europe and UK, just with the passport added, but all by machine. Once they are convinced the biometrics are good enough they’ll do this too to speed things up.