WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a decision barring emergency abortions that violate the law in Texas, which has one of the country’s strictest abortion bans.

Without detailing their reasoning, the justices kept in place a lower court order that said hospitals cannot be required to provide pregnancy terminations that would violate Texas law.

The Biden administration had asked the justices to throw out the lower court order, arguing that hospitals have to perform abortions in emergency situations under federal law. The administration pointed to the Supreme Court’s action in a similar case from Idaho earlier this year in which the justices narrowly allowed emergency abortions to resume while a lawsuit continues.

The administration also cited a Texas Supreme Court ruling that said doctors do not have to wait until a woman’s life is in immediate danger to provide an abortion legally. The administration said it brings Texas in line with federal law and means the lower court ruling is not necessary.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      29 days ago

      I hate this phrasing. It’s not stacking the court. It’s fixing perceived political bias in the court back to neutral where it belongs.

        • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          29 days ago

          The entire reason that they’re appointed positions in the first place was to prevent just that. The actual problem is that these are lifetime appointments with no way to remove them. What we really need is some damn term limits.

      • ChildOfTama@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Exactly. Like, who do you think has been in charge? It’s never going to happen because they want to campaign on it forever.