• celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Whoops. We made the most expensive product ever designed, paid for entirely by venture capital seed funding. Wanna pay for each ChatGPT query now that you’ve been using it for 1.5 years for free with barely-usable results? What a clown. Aside from the obvious abuse that will occur with image, video, and audio generating models, these other glorified chatbots are complete AIDS.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      paid for entirely by venture capital seed funding.

      And stealing from other people’s works. Don’t forget that part

        • exanime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Right, it’s only stolen when regular people use copyright material without permission

          But when OpenAI downloads a car, it’s all cool baby

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          When individual copyright violations are considered “theft” by the law (and the RIAA and the MPAA), violating copyrights of billions of private people to generate profit, is absolutely stealing. While the former arguably is arguably often a measure of self defense against extortion by copyright holding for-profit enterprises.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Barely usable results?! Whatever you may think of the pricing (which is obviously below cost), there are an enormous amount of fields where language models provide insane amount of business value. Whether that translates into a better life for the everyday person is currently unknown.

    • flo@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      barely usable results

      Using chatgpt and copilot has been a huge productivity boost for me, so your comment surprised me. Perhaps its usefulness varies across fields. May I ask what kind of tasks you have tried chatgpt for, where it’s been unhelpful?

      • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Literally anything that requires knowing facts to inform writing. This is something LLMs are incapable of doing right now.

        Just look up how many R’s are in strawberry and see how chat gpt gets it wrong.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Okay what the hell is wrong with it

          It took me three times to convince it that there’s 3 r’s in strawberry…

          • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Because that’s not how LLMs work.

            When you form a sentence you start with an intent.

            LLMs start with the meaning you gave it, and tries to express something similar to you.

            Notice how intent, and meaning aren’t the same. Fact checking has nothing to do with what a word means. So how can it understand what is true?

            All it did was take the meaning of looking for a number and strawberries and ran it’s best guess from that.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yes it says aim for the brain stem but like most things it says, I already knew that. Finally quietness from the hearing the same thing over and over and over and over

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            but like most things it says, I already knew that

            So how long have you been putting glue on your pizza?

                • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I suggest you touch grass if you think remembering some social media server web address that the phone remember.

                  But also if you want to discriminate based on what server a user used to sign up, then it’s already too late for you

                  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    37 minutes ago

                    I don’t know who you think you’re kidding with the “hurrdurr I don’t know what server I’m on” act, when every post you’ve ever made has been on .ml lmao.

                    Trying to deny something so obvious is pretty pathetic.

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s not the incentive you think it is.

        Make sure you go deep. Need to get the whole thing to real show you’re serious.