• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah so if I go rent a Lamborghini for a day that means I own it and don’t have to give it back?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you buy a Lamborghini and they have the ability to later decide you don’t actually own it and take it away, that’s the equivalent. I don’t know why you brought up renting. Renting was never mentioned.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you knew anything about digital purchasing you’d understand why u brought it up.

          When you “buy” a digital tv show or movie you’re not actually buying it, you’re purchasing a license to use it, a license that can be revoked, for content that can be removed.

          I swear most people have no idea how digital ownership works. I expected more from people on here at least.

          • VonReposti@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The equivalent would be that you pay a million for a Lambo which is just an indefinite license they can revoke at any time. Renting isn’t comparable at all.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            We all know how it works. The problem is that’s the only way it works. With a car you can choose to rent. With modern things you “purchase” it, and it only works as long as they want. You do have some alternatives for some media, but for games that’s it. Even if you purchase a disk, the game only functions as long as they allow it.

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Depends, did you literally get the title and agree that you were purchasing it from the last owner before he decided a day later that you were renting it and took it all back?

  • Elise@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wasn’t it Sony that released an album that’d root your system? Bunch of criminals if you ask me.

  • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sony has always treated its customers like absolute trash from the get go. As a kid, I had a stereo that ended up dying. They weaselled out of the warranty. Flash forward to my Sony headphones where one ear died and they did the same. Forward again to my Ericsson phone whose screen died due to “water damage” (the markers were triggered by a friend who worked in their repair department said all phones on high humidity zones were always triggered because back then phones weren’t even dust proof). They sent it back refusing to fix it.

    Since then they have been on my embargo list. One of the worst companies for caring about their customers.

    🖕

      • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah another stellar case in point to show Sony would rather you eat glass than have to do anything for you.

        Let’s not forget the ridiculous court case against Geohotz for jail breaking the PS3. They pulled out every dirty tactic they could in that suit. Really showed their colours and how they actually “fight” in the court of law.

        Scum of the earth.

        • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          My last straw was when they killed OtherOS on the PS3, which was very much part of my purchasing decision. Sure, it was kneecapped from the start (Linux still ran under the hypervisor, could not use the GPU, and was only given 6 Cell cores), but it was there. At least I got a $60 check from the class action settlement!

          Bunch of cocksuckers. I have not purchased a Sony product since.

            • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Basically. In Sony’s case, they were clearly afraid of homebrew games, but I still can’t imagine any other rationale than what you said for killing the feature, especially as neutered as it was. It definitely taught me a lesson about buying products that can’t be kill switched after purchase. The US Air Force even built a cluster of 1700 PS3s that relied on this feature. I’m sure they weren’t routable to the internet to get updates though.

    • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Have to admit though, when it comes to quality equipment, they do take the cake. I’ve never had a Sony product break on me (except my walkman, but that was my fault 😂).

      But, to be honest, I’ve never consumed anything but audio and video equipment from them (receiver amplifiers and TVs). Things may be different in other departments, including their PS department.

        • 0x4E4F@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          What do you mean by that? Hardware wise? Except for the optical media, I can’t really see any hardware flaws…