renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square133fedilink
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·11 days agoWe were using XML for that before JSON.
minus-squareschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down6·11 days agoYes and it is a good thing we don’t anymore.
minus-squaresik0fewl@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·11 days agoWhy? JSON hasn’t given us anything XML hasn’t, except maybe a bit of terseness. I do agree SOAP is a bit over engineered, though, but that’s not the fault of XML.
minus-squareexuAlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 days agoXML is much more annoying to read/write by hand
minus-square0xD@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·11 days agoAs a pentester, if I see XML in HTTP I start crying.
We were using XML for that before JSON.
Yes and it is a good thing we don’t anymore.
Why? JSON hasn’t given us anything XML hasn’t, except maybe a bit of terseness.
I do agree SOAP is a bit over engineered, though, but that’s not the fault of XML.
XML is much more annoying to read/write by hand
As a pentester, if I see XML in HTTP I start crying.