Donald Trump has quietly wound down his presidential campaign in states he was targeting just six weeks ago amid polling evidence showing that Kamala Harris’s entry into the presidential race has put them out of reach and narrowed his path to the White House.

The Republican presidential nominee’s campaign has diverted resources away from Minnesota, Virginia and New Hampshire – states Trump was boasting he could win while Joe Biden was the Democratic candidate – to focus instead on a small number of battleground states.

Money is being poured into the three “blue wall” states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, which were all carried by Biden in 2020 and are seen as vital to the outcome of November’s election.

MBFC
Archive

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unfortunately Harris’ lead in the polls in the battleground states has dropped a little bit. I’m guessing that is due to RFK Jr dropping out.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 months ago

    Trump doesn’t care if he legitimately gets the most votes in any particular state. All he cares about is having MAGA election officials refuse to sign off on the counts in order to cause enough chaos and distrust that the MAGA SCOTUS steps in and either hands him the presidency directly or declares enough results invalid that the decision gets punted to a “one state, one vote” poll in the House (which would be absolutely dominated by red states in that situation).

  • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I love that the election is decided by 3 states containing less than 10% of the population

    Pennsylvania: 13M
    Wisconsin: 6M
    Michigan: 10M
    Total US: 333M
    29/333 = 8.7%

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s like saying the first 94 meters of a 100 meter race don’t matter because the last 6 meters decide the winner. If you don’t finish the last 6 meters ahead, you’ve lost.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not exactly the best comparison though because you have to run all 100 meters in the foot race, but in the presidential race you basically don’t have to run at all in the majority of states.

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That analogy doesn’t work because in these models it’s a straight tie for those 94 meters and it’s the last 6 meters that are left. If the polling data is accurate (big if of course), then the other 47 states cancel each other out in EC votes, so it’s down to these 3.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I mean, if you’re going to use that metric, you might as well go smaller, because a lot of people in those states have already made up their mind. It’s only voters who might be willing to choose or adjust their vote that are in play.

      Only the states that are still undecided enough to tip, and within those, only the voters whose position is still undecided enough to potentially tip.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah. Not unreasonable to say maybe 1% of registered voters are in play, so maybe 200,00 people or so.

        • RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Trump won Michigan by less then 10,000 votes in 2016. Tightest presidential outcome in the states history.

          And that was after Hillary both ignored and insulted the rust belt.

    • confused_code_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those 3 states are huge, but the other swing states are definitely still a factor. If Harris wins all 3 Blue Wall states, she very likely will win the presidency. However, if she doesn’t win all 3, then either candidate’s victory will likely be decided by the other swing states - Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, and Georgia.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s being decided by all the states. Swing states are simply the ones that pollsters can’t accurately predict.

    • Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, on average each state has 2% of the population. So, you could say any state with more than 6m people represents an above average population

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The Republican presidential nominee’s campaign has diverted resources away from Minnesota, Virginia and New Hampshire

    Uh… how many you got left? Is this going to end with Trump doing donuts in a Pittsburgh Walmart parking lot, hoping to swing the Hooner vote?

    Money is being poured into the three “blue wall” states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin

    Oh, honey. You’re not winning Wisconsin.