This is a follow-up from my previous thread.

The thread discussed the question of why people tend to choose proprietary microblogging platfroms (i.e. Bluesky or Threads) over the free and open source microblogging platform, Mastodon.

The reasons, summarised by @noodlejetski@lemm.ee are:

  1. marketing
  2. not having to pick the instance when registering
  3. people who have experienced Mastodon’s hermetic culture discouraging others from joining
  4. algorithms helping discover people and content to follow
  5. marketing

and I’m saying that as a firm Mastodon user and believer.

Now that we know why people move to proprietary microblogging platforms, we can also produce methods to counter this.

How do we get “normies” to adopt the Fediverse?

  • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Indeed, nowadays I just send people to Lemm.ee

    • neutral name (sorry SJW)
    • second biggest instance
    • almost no defederation
    • no topic or country specific (I mean, technically Estonia, but everything happens in English, compared to feddit.org for instance)
    • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      -Neutral name (sorry SJW)

      Boo this person! (I kid, don’t boo them, they’re doing good work and I understand if not everyone wants to be a sh.it.head)

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      almost no defederation

      I don’t think this is really a good thing. Most people don’t want to bother curating their feed and if they get lots of bad stuff from instances that ought to be defederated, then they will leave.