Forgejo is changing its license to a Copyleft license. This blog post will try to bring clarity about the impact to you, explain the motivation behind this change and answer some questions you might have.

…

Developers who choose to publish their work under a copyleft license are excluded from participating in software that is published under a permissive license. That is at the opposite of the core values of the Forgejo project and in June 2023 it was decided to also accept copylefted contributions. A year later, in August 2024, the first pull request to take advantage of this opportunity was proposed and merged.

…

Forgejo versions starting from v9.0 are now released under the GPL v3+ and earlier Forgejo versions, including v8.0 and v7.0 patch releases remain under the MIT license.

  • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yes, but how much cashflow did it have, and how much in dividends did the individual stakeholders receive.

    It never didn’t pay it’s taxes afaik

    Edit: I’m fact checking myself, Amazon’s strategy is reinvesting all profits to support further growth. They were never in a position like the other poster is describing.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There were companies that didn’t survive the dot com crash despite being worth billions. Amazon is a company you would recognize, even though a better company is pets.com

      If you bought their stock you would be very rich for a very short while until it went bankrupt