• KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Onus is on them to actually release a good game, not on the potential customer to have any faith especially with their track record. Turning NMS into a decent game was the least they could have done.

  • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m somewhat excited for this one, curious to see what gameplay loop could hook me in. I can’t help but hope it will capture the same feeling I had when I started exploring Azeroth in WoW. I know it’s a proc gen world but maybe they figured out how to make worlds more lived in.

  • MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    While I am impressed that No Man’s Sky pulled a 180 in the end and I doubt they’ll repeat the same mistakes with this, a dose of some skeptism is always healthy.

    Also, doesn’t hurt to check what the thing looks like at release–we just had The Day Before pull the ol’ switcharoo on people, after all–and how it plays when it’s out before making a purchase (looking right at Cyberpunk the game vs Cyberpunk the game that was pitched to people, here…no amount of “it’s better now” is gonna bring the game that was hyped up before release/used “Work in Progress” as a shield to life. Not without a complete rework. Could also apply to the above The Day Before too). By all means, believe that the devs learned, I really hope they did, cuz as a Fantasy junkie, this looks like something I’d really enjoy…but also be at least a little cautious in what you’re gonna throw money at

    • Jinxyface@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      While I am impressed that No Man’s Sky pulled a 180 in the end

      It didn’t really. They added a lot of what they promised, but still not everything Sean Murray lied about at the beginning.