I think it’s pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    They’d hoover up your data regardless lmao. Anything you post here is fair game. It’s not the same as Instagram measuring how much you look at a post or your location.

    • Awkwardparticle@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      People don’t get that with money they can do whatever they want. Want to do something illegal, just do it because you have unlimited funds to pay your legal team to clean up the mess afterwards. We are absolutely powerless against something that can litigate you to death. Defederating is the only power we have. There is no way to react to anything that happens. There are no consequences for their actions. They don’t even answer to any governments.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    When it comes to Corporates it very much is like the Nazi Bar allegory: you let one Nazi stay because he’s behaving rasonably and being nasty, and sooner or latter the place is going to be full of his friends and turned into a Nazi Bar.

    It’s the same dynamic only with corporate logos, advertising, hypercommercialism and eventual enshitiffication instead of swasticas, racist messaging and violence.

    Certainly in my eperience of it since the 90s, the Internet changed very much this from its early days and spirit as commercial interests from their original foothold almost entirelly subverted it to serve their interests.

    • rando895@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Imagine thinking a few hundred people you disagree with is worse than a mega-corp manipulating information for profits.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    mastodon and Lemmy users jumping to conclusion with weird gatekeeping nonsense and conspiracy theories? shocker. and they wonder why mastodon didn’t take off post twitter.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yall remember that time Facebook did an internal study of the massive psychological harm it and instagram was causing teen girls, then kept it secret and did nothing about it?

      • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        “Aspects of Instagram exacerbate each other to create a perfect storm,” said one internal report, which said pressure to share only the best moments and to look perfect could pitch teenagers into depression, low self-esteem and eating disorders.

        “Issues like negative social comparison and anxiety exist in the world, so they’re going to exist on social media too,” Newton said. “That doesn’t change the fact that we take these findings seriously, and we set up a specific effort to respond to this research and change Instagram for the better.”

        Yes it’s true, looking at pictures of pretty people all day can make some people feel less pretty about themselves. Shocking, I know.

        Odd how you left out the part about them trying to use the study to make instagram better. Totally no bias on your part!

        Would you be more or less upset if they didn’t care to study it at all? Genuinely curious how you think them trying to understand their platform better makes you angry.

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      What rock do you live under that you think Meta isn’t an active threat to the privacy of literally everyone in the world?

  • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    world won’t defederate from the right without a long drawn out process (see Exploding Heads for example). However, if someone posts “Karl Marx is great” or “Communism makes sense” or “capitalism is bad”, you’ll probably see a defederation before the enter key is hit. (Hexbear).

    lemm.ee or lemmy.ml are where it’s at. I don’t think it’s great for power or userbase to be focussed on one instance. lemm.ee has 0.19 and world doesn’t despite their junior and senior infrastructure folk from their full 7 week interview process for volunteer positions.

    Edit: People are on Lemmy likely because the actions of corporate Reddit went too far. In what universe would that demographic be cool with Facebook…

  • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Seems like everyone who is “for” letting threads stay can be summed up by “why would I want to intentionally separate this from a corporate entity when they’ll just get my data anyway” Like that’s a fucking valid argument.

    Oppose corpos at all fronts, it doesn’t matter if they’ll get you anyway. If that’s your take, then if your country ever gets invaded, I expect you to bend over and invite the enemy inside.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Once you implement ActivityPub, you federate with everything that uses ActivityPub. Your server might simply not see every other server yet, but you’re on the same network. With the current implementation, Lemmy will never display a Threads post and Threads will never display a Lemmy thread/comment. But they might send data to each other.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        That makes sense, thanks for the explanation.

        Doesn’t this mean defederation is kinda pointless though, since meta could just stealth-add an activitypub server that did nothing but record all data?

  • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    allowing them to hoover up our data

    Hate to break it to you, but the fediverse is public. Most instances don’t even require an account for read-only access. If Facebook wants your data they don’t need to federate to get it.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      And realistically, there’s nothing stopping them from setting up a bunch of nondescript shell instances to gather data anyway.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Threads content won’t show up in your feed unless you go out of your way to follow a threads user. All defederating does is deny your users the benefits of activity pub. If twitter is anything to go by then Threads content will be on this platform through screenshots anyway.

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Meta should be fully jetisoned from the entire federation. If people want threads, join threads. edit: If people want their sports and brand posts then aggregate using RSS for corporate and non-corp social media. The whole purpose of the fediverse was to be NOT linked to tech bro empires.