• JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      To be honest, privacy is not a major concern of mine and wasn’t a factor in my decision making at all. Things like messages not being e2e encrypted don’t really bother me that much.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        not having e2e bothers me on private 1on1 chat apps.

        i don’t expect it on lemmy though.

            • can@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Under normal circumstances. But there could be federation issues, or someone could run a custom Verizon that just ignores all deletion requests.

              I’m unsure if that’s considered part of the diligence required in Europe.

            • Laborer3652@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Its not a guaranteed thing. As I understand it servers can simply choose to ignore the delete federation. I have never run a Lemmy server though, so take that with a tiny grain of salt.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah, but companies can also “choose” to ignore GDPR requests. I don’t think talking about instances not following the spec and deleting things when requested is relevant.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      As all sites should be. I’m on the internet, mr world wide. When did we expect privacy. Don’t put nothing online you don’t want the world to know.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I used to think like this, but it’s a bit more nuanced./ If you tell people they can’t have any expectation of privacy, it’s essentially telling people of persecuted minorities that they’re not welcome.

        Perfect privacy is impossible, but it shouldn’t be trivial to violate someone’s privacy when their membership of such a community is relevant.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Reddit isn’t privacy-safe either.

      I’d put less bots/more legitimate users as a benefit of lemmy instead of privacy though.