• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    In 2003 I could have made a living selling subscriptions to 5-GB cloud storage that was tightly integrated into Windows.

    I understand why Windows is trying to capture you into it’s cloud ecosystem. Just saying that between M$, Apple, and Google you can do some robust backups, basically for free. And if you’re worried about privacy, just encrypt.

    • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I actually don’t hate onedrive that much. I’ve used it for a while now and it’s one of the best ways to just share a folder with some people very easily. And they can even use the desktop app and you can all have a cloud synced folder, it’s really convenient for collaborating on projects. I know other things can do this, but few do it as seamlessly.

      That said I’m trying pretty hard to ditch it because I hate how Microsoft are just making it the default behaviour without really making it apparent that all your documents just get uploaded to their servers. I hope proton drive gets the features I need soon,.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not about whether the product is good or bad. It’s about the way they maliciously and deceptively try to push it on people.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wish more people were open to learning how to properly configure Windows for family members who will likely never switch to Linux.

      That shit situation sounds entirely avoidable.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I set up my 90 year old grandmother with Ubuntu; she was extremely open to learning. If somebody’s got to learn something, then why not the more useful skill? That’s better for the user, the teacher, and society at large.

  • Bigoldmustard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    My fetish is sending a document as a copy and then seeing someone edit it in realtime while I’m in it.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think they do, most of the MS doomerism I see implies they probably never tried to turn any of it off. I uninstalled one drive years ago along with turning off the ads and telemetry and its all stayed that way ever since, but I keep getting told all of it will be back with the next update. I update when it prompts me to and it never undoes my settings.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      IMO, this kind of meme post is from/for those that are scared and confused by settings dialogs.

      OneDrive is a default, which can be changed.

      They’d rather complain about it than spend 10 minutes fixing it.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The cloud doesn’t exist. It’s just some other computer that you don’t own.

        People don’t get sued for shoving other fictitious concepts down our throats… Religion comes to mind.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The cloud is a shitload of computers connected in such a way that it’s far more reliable than any single computer, and so you don’t need to care about which computer is doing what.

          Yes, those computers physically exist somewhere and are owned by someone, but saying the cloud doesn’t exist is just ridiculous. May as well say clouds in the sky don’t exist either because they’re just water.

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s just it, the “cloud” is just a fancy name for a cluster that’s owned by someone else. Everything you’ve described as what a “cloud” is, has already been defined.

            The term “cloud” is a marketing vapor term that loosely refers to a cluster of hypervisors. That’s how hypervisors at large scale are pretty much always organized.

            The hypervisors in use are not something most people have ever heard of. The most commonly known contenders are hyper-v (which is the basic technology that Azure is built on), and VMware. But most major “cloud” providers, with the exception of Azure, are using something else entirely.

            The same description you’ve provided can also be applied to modern super computers, mainframes, and pretty much anything that lives inside a datacenter.

            A personal computer has a multitude of single points of failure. A single power supply on a single circuit, a single processor, with all memory controllers in that same processor, a single OS drive, a single network interface. Servers generally have multiple power supplies, multiple CPUs, multiple disk drive controllers, connected to multiple disks in some kind of raid or equivalent. Basically all single points of failure, with few exceptions (such as power management/distribution, and the motherboard) have been removed.

            Then you take the servers and scale up to a whole cluster of servers and you get so much more redundancies. A cluster, when done properly is basically bullet proof for failures. Making it larger both increases capacity and redundancy. Without increasing latency. Again, when done right.

            In all, “cloud” is a marketing buzzword. I don’t know of anyone in tech that calls a “cloud” by that name unless they’re talking to someone who doesn’t know that a “cloud” is fictitious.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              The term “cloud” is a marketing vapor term

              I’ma stop you right there. I’m a software engineer who’s implemented a lot of cloud-based stuff. It’s a term of art, not just a marketing word.

        • Programmer Belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thing is M$ is showing you the cloud as the first option to make you use it and buy more space when you need it.

          Google got sued for making the google the default chrome search engine without asking the user. I think M$ is doing the same with the cloud storage but asking you with a pen about to mark their option. And the programs don’t even remember you didn’t choose the cloud the last time.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The cloud doesn’t exist. It’s just some other computer that you don’t own.

        People don’t get sued for shoving other fictitious concepts down our throats… Religion comes to mind.

  • object [Object]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    ah time for horror stories with sparky:

    I know of people who work in IT and use onedrive as a shitty version of github for sharing and version controlling code… If I was them, I’d alteast use syncthing

    • Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      +1 for syncthing

      I use it for synching my Obsidian notes folder between my phone and PC

      (and git for versioning and backups)

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The moment a lawyer saves their medical records in a way that unintentionally and without their consent uploads them to OneDrive, they have a pretty solid case to charge Microsoft for a HIPAA violation.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is feasible to CHOOSE to use OneDrive and take all the proper precautions. We’re talking about home users getting OneDrive data uploaded without their consent through their “push assumed default”, and “giant popup, tiny cancel” setups.

        The article you link only says it’s okay when using a OneDrive business plan together with a signed agreement.

        • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You should be, if you’re in a work computer with privileged documents, controlling it with an appropriate level of care. No matter Linux or Windows. If you’re using home and defaults, you’ve failed no matter what.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            We’re not talking about work computers. We’re talking about patients - end users who have downloaded documents from their doctor.

            These people should not be blamed for using defaults, or for insecure actions happening from their inaction.

            I said home computers multiple times and you again replied about work environments. You need to start paying attention.

            • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              The moment a lawyer saves their medical records in a way that unintentionally and without their consent uploads them to OneDrive, they have a pretty solid case to charge Microsoft for a HIPAA violation

              Are we talking about the same comment?

              • Katana314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Lawyers, once they take off the suit and go home to their kids, are end users, not businesses. It would simply be easier for someone to initiate the lawsuit if they have a background in law.

            • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Ah you’re thinking I’m reading your other comments to other people.

              BTW HIPAA is for providers for their patients information handling. Once it’s in the person’s hands, it’s no longer under HIPPA and it no longer applies. If you decide to put your private medical information on a commercial advertisement board on a highway, and it’s not breaking laws to do with acceptable adcertisement (eg gore or smut) you’ll be able to do that to.

              Basically theres no expectation for a individual person to adhere to HIPPA for their own personal information storage and it doesn’t apply.

              My assumption with your lawyer comment, is this was a insurance or otherwise medical malpractice lawyer who might collect this information for their client cases, since without having client/patient requirements, HIPPA is irrelevant.

    • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      HIPAA doesn’t even require encryption. It’s considered “addressable”. They just require access be “closed”. You can be HIPAA compliant with just Windows login, event viewer, and notepad.

      (Also HIPAA applies to healthcare providers. Adobe doesn’t need to follow HIPAA data protection, though they probably do because it’s so lax, just because you uploaded a PDF of a medical bill to their cloud.)

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        HIPAA applies to whichever entity consciously chooses to move/store data.

        Generally, after a patient downloads a healthcare-related item, they are that entity - and as the patient, they have full control/decisions about where it goes, so they can’t violate their own HIPAA agreement even if they print it and scatter it to the wind.

        BUT, if your operating system “decides” to upload that document without the user’s involvement, then Microsoft is that entity - and having not received conscious permission from the patient, would be in violation. It’s an entirely different circumstance if the user is always going through clear prompts, but their more recent OneDrive Backup goal has been extremely forceful and easy to accidentally turn on - even to the point of being hard to disable. As you said, encryption has nothing to do with it.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          LOL. You really think Microsoft doesn’t have an army of lawyers ensuring they comply with laws like HIPAA?

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            When they’re specifically writing business plans designed for hospitals, sure, they can likely account for it. But not when designing end user services that are laissez-faire about user data privacy - on the random things people put in “My Documents”. As with many organizations, it’s very possible the two parts of the corporation don’t talk to each other.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s not how it works. Microsoft knows Windows will be used in medical settings. They know “but it’s a product for home users” won’t be an effective defense if they cause a HIPAA violation.

              • Katana314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                They also should “know” that being forceful about backup prompts, AI features, and major version upgrades will irritate users into switching off their OS, and yet they’re doing it anyway. Logic is not driving their actions; greed for data is.

                • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Microsoft makes is money by selling products and services. Your data is not nearly as valuable as you think it is.

        • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No. Microsoft is not liable, at least when it applies to HIPAA.

          The HIPAA Rules apply to covered entities and business associates.

          Individuals, organizations, and agencies that meet the definition of a covered entity under HIPAA must comply with the Rules’ requirements to protect the privacy and security of health information and must provide individuals with certain rights with respect to their health information. If a covered entity engages a business associate to help it carry out its health care activities and functions, the covered entity must have a written business associate contract or other arrangement with the business associate that establishes specifically what the business associate has been engaged to do and requires the business associate to comply with the Rules’ requirements to protect the privacy and security of protected health information. In addition to these contractual obligations, business associates are directly liable for compliance with certain provisions of the HIPAA Rules.

          If an entity does not meet the definition of a covered entity or business associate, it does not have to comply with the HIPAA Rules. See definitions of “business associate” and “covered entity” at 45 CFR 160.103.

          https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/covered-entities/index.html

  • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Unpopular opinion: OneDrive automatic integration is amazing. Get a new PC, login, boom. PC at your parents’ house? Boom.

    I tried open source file syncing and it was jank. Everyone making their own cloud is inefficient anyway.

    I just wish windows phone was still a thing and it could all be on the Microsoft account. It remains better value than any other offering.

    That said, if it’s not your thing and you don’t want any of it, I agree there should be a big red “I’ve got this” button if you want to go full manual transmission. Well, windows style, maybe circa Windows 7. Linux is only for those for whom playing with settings is why they computer.

    Also “personalisation” can eat a dick. And stop fucking asking me for feedback. You get 1 star everytime just for asking. I’m done. /rant

      • primarybelief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just curious - do you live your life telling others they are wrong and then provide no counter argument or further info? My disappointment with you is… immeasurable.

      • get_the_reference_@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        To paraphrase Office Space:

        Let me ask you something. Where you work, does anyone ever tell you to “think different?”

        No. No, man. Shit, no, man. I believe you’d get your ass kicked sayin’ something like that, man.

        • user@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Even if it wasn’t spyware, there is 0 reason to use it over other options.

          • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            What do you recommend?

            I want something that I can set up and forget about, that costs a few bucks a month or less, and integrates between all my devices. Security is a given, so let’s assume spyware or not, the data is safe unless I fuck up.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a thousand times, OneDrive is not a backup solution. You should not be using it to sync files between PCs. It’s at best a data sharing solution which also extensively mines your data. If you’re using OneDrive to backup important information you’ll regret it when your data is gone and there’s no support from Microsoft to resolve it.

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Do you have any evidence to support this claim?

        Sounds utterly illegal, and likely to lead to countless lawsuits. They’ve got better phone support than Google, especially when you’re a paying customer, and I’m not expecting one of the biggest corporations on the planet to just up and leave with my data, and I’ve sure as shit never heard of it happening.

        Microsoft products have a bunch of problems I’m happy to moan about, and a UX team that I swear doesn’t even use M$ products, but data security does not seem to be one of them.

  • spirinolas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “Your house, ahahah, nice one! By the way, rent is going up. How much was ‘your’ raise this year?”

    • Doxatek@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Less than the rate of inflation 😮‍💨 guess I make less this year than last year.

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The insurance that costs you $200/month, COULD have cost you $700/month (if you chose this exact plan from this exact provider on your own without HR negotiating a bulk discount)

          So, you’re not losing $200, you’re EARNING $500!!!

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          FaMiLy InCoMe Go Up MeAnS YoU aRe Ok!

          …ok, but I’m a “family” of one and your stupid fucking metric is counting multiple incomes as one…