Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    NAT is, and has always been, an ugly hack. Why would anyone like it?

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Doesn’t that mean private non-routable subnets like 10.x or 192.x have always been a hack?