• Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You know what’s funny? I dream of a form factor like the Nintendo Switch: fully plastic, even the screen, so I could put a high quality glass screen protector like the one I have on the console. The thing is a tank, surviving many falls without a single damage, and I had to swap the protector once in all these years I have it.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Only fashion victims thought that.

    Companies happily obliged them, bumping the price of phones that break much more easily.

  • SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s funny that we buy these metal and glass phones and then protect them with rubber and plastic cases.

    New phones are made to show wear so that they lose resale value.

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I always buy a new phone and a new case and after some years I ditch the case because it wouldn’t hurt to buy a replacement and it feels like a new slimmer version of my trusted phone…

  • aluminium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I will die on the hill that metal unibody phones felt the most premium. Especially Huawei had a few that had a super smooth surface that almost felt like glass.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Metal unibody degrades usability by shielding magnetic/RF signals. That degrades GPS NFC Bleutooth, wireless charging and probably also compass functionality.

      So as I see it, metal bodies are probably not a reasonable option.

      • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        They also get dents, they transfer energy from a drop directly to the insides, they transfer heat from the CPU to your hand… Nah thanks. I’ll take plastic.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The issue there is that metal unibody deigns, attenuate RF signal strength. While they can work, it is a tradeoff.

  • Baggins@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I never thought they couldn’t. Glass phones were an absolutely ridiculous idea.

    • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are plastics that aren’t oil derived. Some of them are even compostable in an industrial setting.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I understand what you mean, but I disagree, there are places where it isn’t necessary, needless use of plastic is a problem. But for the back of a phone, it can avoid buying an even bulkier plastic cover, it can extend the lifetime of the phone, in both cases it reduces waste.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Which is a problem of perception and marketing, given that in many cases a plastic that has been specifically engineered to perform a function will, unsurprisingly, be better than an alternative.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      So your idea of premium is fragile and expensive?
      Plastic has superior usability in every way, weight, bulk, durability, shock absorption, less slippery than glass, meaning it doesn’t drop out of pockets handbags or even hands as easily.
      So what part about a high end plastic is that isn’t premium in this situation?

      • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Utility is for poors. People who don’t count money want something shiny or whatever their peers have. They can easily replace it if it breaks.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s the thinking the article is arguing against.

      But I do have an example.
      High end polycarbonate prescription lenses for glasses.
      The high index, thinnest, lightest lenses, are plastic. Not glass.

          • Litron3000@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            How is that not plastic?
            Carbon fibre without plastic is just a hairy string
            And with silicone I don’t even understand where the confusion is coming from? What else would it be?

            • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              You sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole and now I’m less sure of what plastic actually is. Epoxy, which is used for carbon fiber among many, many, many other things, isn’t something I’d say is plastic but I looked it up and it was about 50/50 on plastic vs not. I found similar conflicting information about silicone but it was leaning more toward not being a plastic.

              • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Plastics are a wide range of synthetic or semi-synthetic materials that use polymers as a main ingredient. - Wikipedia

                : a plastic substance specifically : any of numerous organic synthetic or processed materials that are mostly thermoplastic or thermosetting polymers of high molecular weight and that can be made into objects, films, or filaments -Merriam Webster

                plastic, polymeric material that has the capability of being molded or shaped, usually by the application of heat and pressure. This property of plasticity, often found in combination with other special properties such as low density, low electrical conductivity, transparency, and toughness, allows plastics to be made into a great variety of products. These include tough and lightweight beverage bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), flexible garden hoses made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), insulating food containers made of foamed polystyrene, and shatterproof windows made of polymethyl methacrylate. -Brittanica

                Composites like CF and fiberglass use those materials as a stress distributing component and a plastic component as the rigid layer.

                Historically fiberglass composites used things like polyester resin - a polymer derived from oil - as the rigid component.

                If that’s not a plastic, what is it then?

                Metal? Wood? Glass?

              • Litron3000@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                What would you define as plastic then?
                Or maybe share some source claiming epoxy isn’t plastic?

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      True, too many people treat phones like a status symbol or fast fashion instead of a tool that should be maintained and used for many years.

      • schnokobaer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s time to stop thinking a phone should be premium

        too many people treat phones like a status symbol

        Honestly just be glad you’re not among those misguided and move on.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Good philosophy. I’ve found that I’m much happier on the internet since I stopped being bothered about other people being “wrong”. I cannot save the world, but if I can help out a few people then that’s enough.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        A tool can also be premium, and there is definitely a difference between an average phone and a premium phone.
        The problem is all the nonsense about the premium FEEL, it’s not a feature when it degrades durability, or requires a cover that removes that premium feel anyway. Glass covers are also more slippery, making it more likely to drop out of a pocket or hand bag or even your hands.
        Glass is detrimental in every way for usability, just the extra weight of it, makes drops more likely to cause damage. All the reviewers that push “The Premium Feel” without consideration to the downsides, like being slippery, adding weight, being more fragile and making the phone slightly more bulky, should be banned from making reviews.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          pandering to reviewers who use the phones for a couple of days imstead of actual consumers who want to use it for a few years is probably the stupidest thing they do in this industry

          give me a fucking replaceable battery so i can use it for more than a couple of years, stop removing features we all use just so it can feel futuristic and new. give me a repairable fucking phone.

          like holy shit please take this off the hands of bean counting capitalists and marketers, and please put computers back in the hands of engineers.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, I completely agree on the complicity of reviewers parroting the same PR buzzwords in every single review. It definitely feels like they have played their part in normalising many of these objectively bad and anti-consumer design decisions.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s time to stop thinking phones are anything but commodity hardware with variable degrees of shittiness. There are no such things as premium phones, just premium prices.

  • DriftinGrifter@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    nah phones aint premium until the price is lower f*cking phone costs so you dont have to spend half a months salary just to not have it become junk in 3 years and not be a buggy mess at launch premium is not paying an arm and a leg and not having your every move tracked and sold to the highest bidder

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The first Android phones were really exciting. I got a Samsung Galaxy (no numbers, no letters, just Galaxy) in 2009. AMOLED screen - the first Android experience for me. Unfortunately Samsung dropped the update support really soon - which got me into custom ROMs - another exciting thing…

    • lnxtx@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      When I switched from shitty LCD to nice AMOLED screen. It was Galaxy S3 I think.

      Then, meh, I don’t like huge phones without the bezels.

      • Fubber Nuckin'@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wish thicker bezels were more common tbh. It’s annoying to swipe from the side of the screen when my case is in the way.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You don’t like paying for a phone that’s the price of a mortgage payment, while having features removed every year?

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    High end plastics are by far the superior material from any usability perspective. I hate glass phones, and the first glass phone I bought of course broke in only 4 months! Where I’d never had a phone break on me before. And any of my older plastic phones would probably barely have noticed the tiny drop that broke my glass back phone.
    Now I have an added plastic cover, which is ugly, and makes the phone unnecessarily bigger than if it had a quality plastic body instead of the moronic glass.

    I will never buy anything but phones with a plastic back in the future. Problem is that often the only alternative is vegan leather, which is also not as durable and will show wear way before a high end plastic back.

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Premium phones make little sense, based on what I’ve seen everyone puts them in cases anyway. “Premium materials” are slippery and “premium thinness” results in insufficient battery capacity so accessories like phone rings get put on them, and people carry around external battery packs.

    Why not just make a grippy, practical phone that I can use as a tool, with removable batteries, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and expandable memory?

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      so fairphone?, look it up, it’s a phone maker that do exactly that

    • slimarev92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The only thing premium phones have going for them are really good cameras. I love midrange phones but the photos they produce are not as good as flagships.

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Because that phone would last and you would only need a new one every 4-5 or however many years instead of 1-2 so capitalist companies won’t see that as having any value.

      I think companies know what people want and how to make a great phone like that, just none of them will or want to be the first.

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t need the audio jack, but I guess it doesn’t hurt. There are phones that have all that, but unfortunately they are at most mid-range phones which isn’t what I’m looking for.