• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    He was informed of the potential repercussions in the first hearing. It was the second of two hearings when Merchan said while he was reluctant to put a former president in jail, but continued acts would leave him no choice. That was the end of the violations.

    The goal of the gag order is to mandate compliance, not leverage a holding cell. Again, Merchan handled it by the book.

    I’d love to see him in jail, or better yet, prison, but it’s not worth compromising the judges ruling into bias.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Merchan said while he was reluctant to put a former president in jai

      He was biased to not put him in jail.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Sentencing is based on character and severity of crime. Being a former President speaks favorably in court. It’s not about money or influence.