• A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The main argument from prosecution to this end was that the encounter happened in 2006 (ish, I might be off) but the hush money wasn’t an issue until the election campaign. Therefore, they argued, it was paid (and covered up with false business records) to influence the election.