• plateee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 个月前

    Because Photoshop is far superior to gimp for… reasons? But Photoshop costs $$$$$, so this is like free.

    /s

    Honestly, the only thing not to like about GIMP is the name. There was a fork a while ago, but that closed down.

      • LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        30 天前

        I hoped someone would correct me and tell me I am stupid and that of course GIMP has nondestructive transforms and then procede to explain how. I guess that trick doesn’t always work :p

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        30 天前

        And pixel management.

        But Krita somehow fulfills that, configured correctly.

        There are also the high seas for those who want to sail! Old shops are very good, no ai stuff.

      • CmykStudent@fosstodon.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        29 天前

        @LegoBrickOnFire @plateee For raster layers, yes (at the moment). You can do non-destructive transforms on vector layers and link layers (so you could add an external PNG/JPEG/SVG/etc to a composition as a layer and then non-destructively transform it).

        Transforms are really a filter under the hood, so we have the infrastructure to make them all non-destructive. Just need to work on the UI elements. :)

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 天前

        If you’re a Mac user (like many designers) Pixelmator is an excellent alternative to PS, it’s lacking in some of the smart object/layer stuff I used to lean on heavily in adobe world (illustrator smart layers in ps used to be clutch in the old skewomorphic days).