Timestamps:

00:00 Intro

00:36 Sponsor: TuxCare

01:46 KDE’s AI policy

06:42 Existing AI policies

10:06 Going further on AI

12:58 My stance on AI

17:05 FOSS projects: yes or no to AI?

28:02 Sponsor: Tuxedo Computer

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 天前

    Sure, it’s an everywhere problem. But it would be nice to see more projects having strong preventative policies.

    • nocteb@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 天前

      I think it is more important to leave people the freedom to decide for themselves. It’s not an opensource project’s place to tell its contributers how to work as long as the contribution fits their requirements. No one’s opinion is worth more than the other one’s.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 天前

        “Individual freedom” as a primary driver over the last decades/centuries is what’s got the USA into the state it’s in now. I’d rather focus on something that contributes to the collective good.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 天前

            Sure can be. But it’s also a vital part of how any society works - it’s what laws are for (making no claims about the efficacy of current legal systems here), and it’s how you keep power in check. Libertarianism doesn’t work.

            • nocteb@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 天前

              There is no law that prohibits AI use. Telling people what to do also does not work it is usually met with resistance.