deleted by creator
Sounds like some
bullshit artistmotivational speakerProbably an AI expert too
And a Bitcoin Scholar
Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire “crypto” shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways
WTF does Indian have to do with anything?
So you feel this is perhaps racist but no concern for it also being perhaps ageist?
Ok sure. I’ll endeavor to be more perfectly critical of people if that pleases you.
deleted by creator
Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don’t know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you’re also not taken seriously when you’re young
!linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works back at it again with some more AI bs.
Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?
AI = 0 □
This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d’Alembert operator at the end
Obviously the statement is obsurd. If you wanted to get super pedantic, if we let AI =√P*C and rearrange to get rid of the square root then we arrive Einstein’s full equation. E2 = (MC2 )2 + PC2. Where P is equal to the momentum of the object. Then AI is just a symbol for the energy stored in momentum. So they’re technically correct, which as we all know is the most important type of correct.
(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn’t give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.
Instead you’d get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2
And that’s not even the correct formula. It’s
E^2 = (mc(2))2 + (pc)^2
You can’t just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).
The way to remember this is that it’s equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).
So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.
In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)
Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?
And where does the O(v^4) term come from?
Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.
Honestly I had too many people insist that Tedx has any value
I paid to watch it! Hey, wait a second… Do you think Mr. XTalk could be just trying to take our money while building a disinformation platform of unchecked greed?
TedX talk? More like:
Step right up, folks, and witness the magnificent medicinal miracle of Simpson and Son’s patented revitalizing tonic. [deep breath] Put some ardor in your larder with our energizing, moisturizing, tantalizing, romanticizing, surprising, her-prizing, revitalizing tonic.
I’d like to present the equation solution to all sandwich related crisiseseses: BLT+AI.
Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?
Worse, iceberg lettuce. If the first one is also iceberg, pass.
I like how the OP’s name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?
I want to know who this idiot is.
his name is Chatgpt
I mean, the equation isn’t wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.
I choose to believe he’s just looking for VC money and is not actually that stupid lol
what is one unit of ‘Artificial(A)’ and also ‘Intelligence(I)’ mathemetically defined as?
…besides e - mc^2
As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I’d bet money that was written by an LLM.
yeah it reads exactly like something chatgpt would write
How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?
The ways of compression artifacts are mysterious.
😆
Yes it’s not https
Wouldnt that be the same as using a multicore modeller computer, since AI is just semi randomizing code?
It wouldn’t be the same if he multiplied by ψ+ signifying that we are moving towards quantum future
I can suggest an equation that has the potential to impact the future:
H|ψ> = E|ψ> + AI
Here, I have chosen the time-independent Schrödinger equation, to symbolize the fact that AI is the most important innovation of all time.
…
This is all bullshit of course. Everyone knows that the AI term should be included in the Hamiltonian anyway 🙄
This doesn’t look right since you’ve written the equation for very slow movement (sub-relativistic) and including the AI term should increase all the velocities in your ensemble exponentially.
LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity
When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.
So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood…
Well math might be, physics for sure isn’t
I feel like you are forgetting QCD, where they actually added a splash of colour to change the mood of the reader.
AI+8k+5G
We need a = sign sonewhere, right?
Nope, none of this is math.
He should have let an AI proofread this…
It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT
