• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    My code would look like this:

    if{x>0}

    positivecountplusplus;

    no, not that, I mean positivecountplusplus;

    No! I mean increment positivecount;

    NO! Erase, stop typing all that;

    Erase last four lines;

    FUCK!;

    {endif}

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      185
      ·
      6 days ago

      I can only assume they’re saying prompts for vibevoded slop, not trying to write actual code verbally.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        5 days ago

        "Like, do that thing where it counts by one until it gets to a predefined number, but make that number equal to the number of statements. But, like, do it where it doesn’t suck like last time.

        “Nooooo, why does it keep counting to 2? Now 3? 4?!”

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      Person that can say if ( sSmeUngdlyVarName.equalsignorecase(‘test string’) ) {
      ListVryViabNameForlst.add(sSmeUngldyVarName); } Faster than I can type it?

      Or they are just script kiddies.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        6 days ago

        Or they are just script kiddies.

        Worse, they’re vibe coders.

        The big secrets they’re keeping from their coworkers are things like adding “and make sure there are no bugs in it” to the end of their prompt.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 days ago

          The part that frustrates me is that we already have been through this sort of shit with “smart speakers”. The slowest way to interact with a computer or machine will always be through speech.

          Even vibe coding 🤮, you’d be faster typing.

          • tempest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            When Vibe coding the slowest thing is reading the code produced. If you review the code though everything grinds to a halt. I’ve vibe coded a feature or two. It took 1 day to vibe code and another week or two to properly review the code it wrote.

            The industry ‘secret’ is that no one gives a shit. Claude has like two 9s of uptime.