• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m not even saying I disagree, but I don’t think those move the needle on public sentiment like the Sony and Microsoft stuff. “Well, I don’t pirate Switch games, so my console won’t get bricked.” vs “Hey! But I buy physical copies of games!” and “Hey! They’re laying off a bunch of people, and I can imagine how that would feel.”

    Honestly, what Sony is doing to capture platform lock-in isn’t substantially different from what Nintendo did. They were just quieter about it, or maybe they phrased the announcement better, or maybe they just get away with it because it’s not as visceral.

    • Nugscree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Sony is also not actively getting patents that are so broad the it stifles competition like Nintendo does, and did specifically to try and win the Palworld lawsuit.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        No, they’re probably doing it too. They definitely did it in mobile phones, suing Apple for having phone call ringer silencing tech in their phones for instance; I would be surprised if they aren’t doing it in gaming too.

        • Nugscree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          But did Sony get that patent after the fact, or did they already have it and went after Apple for using the tech? Both are stupid, the first is just worse than the other.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Personally, I don’t think the patent should’ve been granted in the first place, so either way I think it’s totally stupid.