• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is the second time someone’s said this to me recently, which is weird because of how obviously wrong it is. How is it hypocrisy if I’m making a choice that also reduces suffering to plants? It’s just complete nonsense, the argument is either uninformed or bad faith, so it doesn’t demonstrate anything.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Lmao, stuck because your whole argument completely fell apart? Just drop a conversational instawin!

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            “In kind” wtf are you talking about? “In kind” would be refuting my arguments logically. The problem being that your position completely fell apart, so you can’t.

            • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              In kind in this context means I’m giving the same level of responses. Obviously, logic would be far outside that level.

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    “If vegans care so much about reducing harm to animals, why don’t they extend that to plants? This proves they’re hypocrites.”

                    “But vegans do reduce harm to plants.”

                    “Uhh uhh uhh but if you used logic somehow it still shows uhh you’re dumb”

                    Ok dude.