I don’t think you understand what abolitionism is. Abolitionism isn’t “Individuals don’t want to be slaves”, abolitionism is the idea that slavery, as a facet of society, should be abolished.
Notably, Sparatacus’s rebellion, which is often cited by such views, enslaved numerous people in their rampage across the Italian peninsula.
This is not a revisionist view. Ironically, the view being presented, of the timelessness of abolitionism, is itself revisionist and, for that matter, extremely fringe.
The French Revolution would be a hard one for them to miss. Even accounting for Eurocentric biases, the French Revolution is a pretty major event.
Spartacus, probably not. Even from a Western standpoint the impact is mostly in cultural references rather than the way it affected the course of history.
I don’t think you understand what abolitionism is. Abolitionism isn’t “Individuals don’t want to be slaves”, abolitionism is the idea that slavery, as a facet of society, should be abolished.
Notably, Sparatacus’s rebellion, which is often cited by such views, enslaved numerous people in their rampage across the Italian peninsula.
This is not a revisionist view. Ironically, the view being presented, of the timelessness of abolitionism, is itself revisionist and, for that matter, extremely fringe.
I wonder if modern china teaches spartacus and french revolution
The French Revolution would be a hard one for them to miss. Even accounting for Eurocentric biases, the French Revolution is a pretty major event.
Spartacus, probably not. Even from a Western standpoint the impact is mostly in cultural references rather than the way it affected the course of history.