• alakey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ngl that was the only unique thing that attracted me to 7 and now that they effectively backpedaled I don’t see why would I fire up 7 over 6 or 5. Yeah it’s still an option, but them giving up on what was supposed to be the core feature of the entry is a sign that whatever the future content updates may be - they will be made with 1 civ through all ages in mind. Wish they would’ve stuck to their guns and instead improved on the idea, oh well.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There was no improving on that idea. Just a bad mechanic to its core. In a game called “Civilization” you couldn’t even play as one.

    • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Agreed. I haven’t picked it up yet since the best time to get Civ is a few years after it’s release but that was the single most refreshing thing that nearly made me buy it on release. I’m a bit disappointed that they’re backtracking on it instead of committing to improving it.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same. They took a risk with that in 7 and I liked that. What I didn’t like was starting over each time, I would have liked a new Civ but then simply continue on with different perks. Now it’s the same as 5 and 6